Shouldn't there be a copy ctor invocation here? Elision disabled (no named return value optimiza...

NRVO vs early return for types not benefitting from move semantics (GCC 14 -Wnrvo)...

Can NRVO and Move Semantics Be Used Together in C++?...

Can NRVO be turned off in debug builds?...

When in C++14 with RVO/NRVO closed, how is the object returned?...

C++ nrvo/copy elision with return statement in parentheses...

NRVO. Turning off elision. C++11 vs C++17...

Can a C++ compiler perform RVO for a named const variable used for the return value?...

best strategy for ensuring no copies in return by value...

Returning a pair of objects...

Can a C++ compiler perform RVO for a const return value?...

If a variable is assigned an object returned by a function, is it copied or created in-place?...

Why does Return Value Optimization not happen if no destructor is defined?...

Will structure like std::list<std::pair<string, string>> be copied when returned?...

How to avoid the "pessimizing-move" warning of NRVO?...

How to enforce RVO for operator return value?...

Named Return Value Optimization when using std::optional...

can't find a way to make garanteed return value optimization work...

Is NRVO valid with exception throwing in body?...

Is a move constructor/assignment needed for RVO to kick in in C++11?...

NRVO for C++ std::string...

Symmetric operator+ in terms of operator+= in modern C++?...

Will (N)RVO be applied with my function in this situation?...

if I return a class in my function, where does it store?...

Does returning a default constructed object prevent NRVO?...

Why is the move constructor called in this case?...

Are compilers clever enough to std::move variables going out of scope?...

Out params vs. NRVO in the presence of error codes...

When the move constructor is actually called if we have (N)RVO?...

How does C++ ABI deal with RVO and NRVO?...