How to avoid redefinition error in case of in-class definition of friend function template?

Question

Consider this code:

template<typename T>
class Base
{
   template<typename U>
   friend void f(void *ptr) {
     static_cast<Base<U>*>(ptr)->run();
   }
   protected:
       virtual void run() = 0; 
};
 
class A : public Base<A>
{
   protected:
       virtual void run() {}
};
 
/*
class B : public Base<B>
{
   protected:
       virtual void run() {}
};
*/

It compiles fine now (ideone). But if I uncomment the definition of B, then it gives the following error (ideone):

prog.cpp: In instantiation of ‘Base<B>’:
prog.cpp:20:   instantiated from here
prog.cpp:6: error: redefinition of ‘template<class U> void f(void*)’
prog.cpp:6: error: ‘template<class U> void f(void*)’ previously defined here

I know (well,I think I know) the reason why it gives this error.

So my question is :

How to avoid redefinition error in case of in-class definition of friend function template?

As long as I provide the definition of the primary template (not specialization) inside the class, I will get this error. There is also another problem with defining primary template in this way: it makes all instantiations of f function template friend of all instantiations of Base class template, which I also would like to avoid. I want to make f<T> a friend of Base<T> but not f<U> a friend of Base<T> if U and T are not same. At the same time, I also want to provide the definition inside the class. Is it possible?

Answer 1

Do you really need to define f into the class? If you define it outside, your problem disappears and you can also enforce the one-to-one relationship you want (i.e. only f<T> is a friend of Base<T>):

template <typename T> class Base;

template <typename U>
void f(void *ptr) {
   static_cast<Base<U>*>(ptr)->run();
}

template<typename T>
class Base
{
   friend void f<T>(void *ptr); //only one instanciation is a friend

   protected:
     virtual void run() = 0; 
};

However, note that the fact that only f<T> is a friend of Base<T> will not prevent the following code from compiling:

B b;
f<A>(&b); // compiles, f<A> calls Base<A>::run, but the cast is wrong