Related: What's the point of Content-Script-Type and Content-Style-Type.
I wanted to know what the main reasons are that developers don't use
<meta http-equiv="content-script-type" content="text/javascript" /> and<meta http-equiv="content-style-type" content="text/css" />in their web projects. (Me neither, btw.)
Saving one from having to declare the used type on every instance of <script> and <style>, it does not seem to have any drawbacks. Yet, in fact, I have never seen one of them in the wild. Are there any considerations one has to take when relying on these <meta> tags?
According to W3C, http-equiv values "content-style-type" & "content-script-type" attributes are unknown for HTML5 meta markup! Moreover, W3C validator throws the following error when an HTML5 page has such markups:
Line X, Column Y: Bad value Content-Script-Type for attribute http-equiv on element meta.
<meta http-equiv="Content-Script-Type" content="text/javascript">
So essentially we are supposed to avoid them.