We are using the #ziplib (found here) in an application that synchronizes files from a server for an occasionally connected client application.
My question is, with this algorithm, when does it become worthwhile to spend the execution time to do the actual zipping of files? Presumably, if only one small text file is being synchronized, the time to zip would not sufficiently reduce the size of the transfer and would actually slow down the entire process.
Since the zip time profile is going to change based on the number of files, the types of files and the size of those files, is there a good way to discover programmatically when I should zip the files and when I should just pass them as is? In our application, files will almost always be photos though the type of photo and size may well change.
I havent written the actual file transfer logic yet, but expect to use System.Net.WebClient to do this, but am open to alternatives to save on execution time as well.
UPDATE: As this discussion develops, is "to zip, or not to zip" the wrong question? Should the focus be on replacing the older System.Net.WebClient method with compressed WCF traffic or something similar? The database synchronization portion of this utility already uses Microsoft Synchronization Framework and WCF, so I am certainly open to that. Anything we can do now to limit network traffic is going to be huge for our clients.
To determine whether it's useful to compress a file, you have to read the file anyway. When on it, you might as well zip it then.
If you want to prevent useless zipping without reading the files, you could try to decide it on beforehand, based on other properties.
You could create an 'algorithm' that decides whether it's useful, for example based on file extention and size. So, a .txt file of more than 1 KB can be zipped, but a .jpg file shouldn't, regardless of the file size. But it's a lot of work to create such a list (you could also create a black- or whitelist and allow c.q. deny all files not on the list).