I found two implementations of roles and permissions, tell me please what is better to use and why? Implementation using enum ("Permission" is also enum):
public enum Role {
USER(Collections.emptySet()),
ADMIN(
Set.of(
ADMIN_READ,
ADMIN_UPDATE,
ADMIN_DELETE,
ADMIN_CREATE,
MANAGER_READ,
MANAGER_UPDATE,
MANAGER_DELETE,
MANAGER_CREATE
)
),
Or using class ("Permission" is also class here it connected through ManyToMany relation):
@Entity
public class Role {
@Id
@GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.AUTO)
private Long id;
private String name;
@ManyToMany(mappedBy = "roles")
private Collection<User> users;
@ManyToMany
@JoinTable(
name = "roles_privileges",
joinColumns = @JoinColumn(
name = "role_id", referencedColumnName = "id"),
inverseJoinColumns = @JoinColumn(
name = "privilege_id", referencedColumnName = "id"))
private Collection<Privilege> privileges;
}
Both are valid for several reasons, but it depends on how flexible and scalable you want your roles to be.
Enum is simple, type-safe, and performant but lacks flexibility and scalability, which is why they are perfect for small static applications where you have a fixed predictable set of permissions. As soon as you want to set up complex permissions and granularity in specifying access to certain tables in databases, for example, I recommend going for classes. That way you can easily add, remove, or modify roles and permissions without changing the codebase.
Ultimately, if you're working on a project where roles and permissions are fixed and unlikely to change, and where simplicity and performance are priorities, the enum-based approach is a good fit. However, if you're developing a system that requires dynamic management of roles and permissions, and where scalability and flexibility are important, the class-based approach with database integration is the better choice.