I am running two regressions that I thought would yield identical results and I'm wondering whether anyone can explain why they are different. One is with statsmodels OLS and the other is with linearmodels PanelOLS.
A minimum working example is shown below. The coefficients are similar, but definitely not the same (0.1167 and 0.3514 from statsmodels, 0.1101 and 0.3100 from linearmodels). And the R-squared is quite different too (0.953 vs 0.767).
import statsmodels.formula.api as smf
from linearmodels import PanelOLS
from statsmodels.datasets import grunfeld
data = grunfeld.load_pandas().data
# Define formula and run statsmodels OLS regression
ols_formula = 'invest ~ value + capital + C(firm) + C(year) -1'
ols_fit = smf.ols(ols_formula,data).fit()
# Set multiindex and run PanelOLS regression
data = data.set_index(['firm','year'])
panel_fit = PanelOLS(data.invest,data[['value','capital']],entity_effects=True).fit()
# Look at results
ols_fit.summary()
panel_fit
Any insight appreciated!
To replicate the same Betas you should use both entity_effect
and time_effect
to the panel ols, as follows:
import statsmodels.formula.api as smf
from linearmodels import PanelOLS
from statsmodels.datasets import grunfeld
data = grunfeld.load_pandas().data
# Define formula and run statsmodels OLS regression
ols_formula = 'invest ~ value + capital + C(firm) + C(year) -1'
ols_fit = smf.ols(ols_formula,data).fit()
# Set multiindex and run PanelOLS regression
data = data.set_index(['firm','year'])
panel_fit = PanelOLS(
data.invest,
data[['value','capital']],
entity_effects=True,
time_effects=True
).fit()
# Look at results
print(ols_fit.summary())
print(panel_fit)
Which leads to:
OLS
value 0.1167
capital 0.3514
R-squared: 0.953
PANEL OLS
value 0.1167
capital 0.3514
R-squared: 0.7253
However, R-squared will remain different due to the different nature of the 2 regressions. In the Panel you have just 2 regressors (value, capital) with firms and year set as fixed effects. While in the OLS regression you have many regressors as the number of dummies created (firms and year) + the value and capital variables. So this naturally leads to a higher R^2