I am trying to add unit tests to my angular component which is dependent on a service. The component is subscribing to a flag variable in the service. I am trying to use ng-mocks to mock the service using the MockProvider. And while trying to set the default mock behaviour in the test.ts file, am getting an error, which I couldn't make sense of.
"The last overload gave the following error. Argument of type 'typeof SomeService' is not assignable to parameter of type 'AnyDeclaration<{ flags: Observable; flagChange: Observable; }>[]'."
Below is the code. Any other approach to mock the subject and unit test the component. If I am not initializing the flagChange to EMPTY in the test.ts, I am getting the "Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'subscribe')" Error. Service.ts
import { Injectable, OnDestroy } from '@angular/core';
import * as LDClient from 'launchdarkly-js-client-sdk';
import { LDFlagValue } from 'launchdarkly-js-client-sdk';
import { Observable, Subject, of } from 'rxjs';
import { map } from 'rxjs/operators';
@Injectable({
providedIn: 'root',
})
export class SomeService implements OnDestroy {
ldClient!: LDClient.LDClient;
flags: LDClient.LDFlagSet;
flagChange!: Subject<Object>;
private readonly _destroying$ = new Subject<void>();
ldClientId: string;
constructor(private globalvars: GlobalVars) {
this.ldClientId = 'client-id';
this.flags = {
'allow_edit': false,
};
}
ngOnDestroy(): void {
this._destroying$.next(undefined);
this._destroying$.complete();
}
initializeLD() {
const context = {
kind: 'user',
key: 'my-key',
};
this.ldClient = LDClient.initialize(this.ldClientId, context);
this.ldClient.on('initialized', () => {
const boolFlagValue = this.ldClient.variation(
'allow_edit'
) as boolean;
this.flags['allow_edit'] = boolFlagValue;
this.flagChange.next(this.flags);
});
this.ldClient.on('change', (allChanges) => {
this.flags['allow_edit'] =
allChanges['allow_edit'].current;
this.flagChange.next(this.flags);
});
this.ldClient.on('ready', () => {
const boolFlagValue = this.ldClient.variation(
'allow_edit'
) as boolean;
});
}
}
test.ts
ngMocks.defaultMock(SomeService , () => ({
flags: EMPTY,
flagChange: EMPTY //Have declared it as "flagChange: ()=> EMPTY" as well
}));
component.ts
constructor(private featureFlag: SomeService) {
this.allow_edit= featureFlag.flags['allow_edit'];
this.allow_edit= featureFlag.flagChange.subscribe((flags:any) => {
this.allow_edit= flags['allow_edit'];
});
}
spec.ts
fdescribe('SomeComponent', () => {
let component: SomeComponent;
let fixture: ComponentFixture<SomeComponent>;
beforeEach(async () => {
await TestBed.configureTestingModule({
imports: [HttpClientModule],
declarations: [SomeComponent],
providers: [
MockProvider(SomeService),
],
}).compileComponents();
fixture = TestBed.createComponent(SomeComponent);
component = fixture.componentInstance;
fixture.detectChanges();
});
it('should create', () => {
expect(component).toBeTruthy();
});
});
The thing here is that EMPTY
doesn't satisfy Subject<Object>
, because EMPTY
doesn't provide .next()
. That's why you get the error.
To fix that you have 2 options: cast type (suppress error) or use proper mock (satisfy types):
even TS won't show you errors, in this case flagChange.next
will fail, because EMPTY
doesn't have it.
ngMocks.defaultMock(SomeService , () => ({
flags: EMPTY,
flagChange: EMPTY as never,
}));
https://stackblitz.com/edit/github-topg3g?file=src%2Ftest.spec.ts
ng-mocks
providers MockService
, which mocks all methods and applies customizations if any specified.
ngMocks.defaultMock(SomeService , () => ({
flags: EMPTY,
flagChange: MockService(Subject, EMPTY),
}));
Now flagChange.next()
is a mock function, and .subscribe()
comes from EMPTY
.