I understand, this is how we develop our custom validation attribute in ASP.NET:
[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Property | AttributeTargets.Parameter, AllowMultiple = false, Inherited = false)]
public class GreaterThanZeroIntegerValidationAttribute : ValidationAttribute
{
protected override ValidationResult? IsValid(Object? value, ValidationContext validationContext)
{
if (value is Int32 id && id > 0)
return ValidationResult.Success;
var memberNames = new List<String>{ validationContext.MemberName! };
var errorMessage = String.Format("Invalid {0}.", validationContext.MemberName!);
return new ValidationResult(errorMessage, memberNames); //code in question
}
}
In the code statement return new ValidationResult(errorMessage, memberNames);
, I am passing a list of member names, even though it has only a single item.
I also, tried using this validation on 2 properties of a view-model:
public class OrderViewModel
{
[GreaterThanZeroIntegerValidation]
public Int32 Id { get; set; }
[GreaterThanZeroIntegerValidation]
public Int32 SomeOtherInt32Property { get; set; }
//Other properties with different validation attributes
}
when the validation failed for both of them, this custom validation attribute was called twice, separately.
Here is the comment in the ValidationResult
source code: This list of member names is meant to be used by presentation layers to indicate which fields are in error
.
I understood the meaning of this statement but was unable to understand - why need a list of member names, when validation attribute is called every time for every property it is used on? Or I am interpreting the use of this parameter in a completely wrong way, I am not sure.
Question - What is the exact reason of having memberNames
parameter of public ValidationResult(string? errorMessage, IEnumerable<string>? memberNames)
as collection type and not singular/non-collection? Also, if possible, please provide a real world scenario that am I missing here.
The memberNames
parameter in the ValidationResult
constructor is designed to handle scenarios where a validation error is not specific to a single member but may apply to multiple members of an object. It allows you to indicate which members are in error when returning a ValidationResult
object.
While a validation attribute is called for each property it is applied to, there are cases where a validation error may span across multiple properties. For example, imagine a scenario where you have a form with multiple fields, and you want to validate a combination of values across those fields. In such cases, you can use the memberNames
parameter to indicate that the error is not specific to a single property but applies to multiple properties.
Here's an example to illustrate this:
public class CustomValidationAttribute : ValidationAttribute
{
protected override ValidationResult IsValid(object value, ValidationContext validationContext)
{
// Check if the values of two properties are valid together
var property1Value = ...; // Get the value of property 1
var property2Value = ...; // Get the value of property 2
if (!IsValidCombination(property1Value, property2Value))
{
var memberNames = new[] { "Property1", "Property2" };
return new ValidationResult("Invalid combination of values.", memberNames);
}
return ValidationResult.Success;
}
}
In this example, the CustomValidationAttribute
validates a combination of values from two properties (Property1
and Property2
). If the combination is invalid, it creates a ValidationResult
object with an error message and provides the names of both properties in the memberNames
parameter.