I solve Purescript exercise from the book https://book.purescript.org/chapter6.html#multi-parameter-type-classes
I don't understand what "zero" statement is?
I have "Complex" type, and should define Semiring Complex instance of it.
newtype Complex
= Complex
{ real :: Number
, imaginary :: Number
}
Simple solution to define zero complex element (0.0+0.0i) as
instance semiringComplex :: Semiring Complex where
zero = Complex {real: 0.0, imaginary: 0.0}
But another solution, presented in this book is
instance semiringComplex :: Semiring Complex where
zero = Complex zero
I do not understand, how does this statement work ("Complex zero"), if zero defined as function (not as a Complex type element)
> :t zero
forall (a :: Type). Semiring a => a
And what I found tricky is
cz = Complex zero
> cz
0.0+0.0i
How does PSCI understand that zero is 0.0+0.0i, but I did not define 0.0 constants?
zero
is a method of the Semiring
class. So it works for any type for which there is an instance of that class.
It just so happens that there is an instance of the Semiring
class for Record r
- that is, for records. As long as there are Semiring
instances for all the record's field types. And the way that instance is defined is that zero
is a record with all fields set to their respective zero
values.
So, for example:
(zero :: { x :: Int, y :: Unit }) == { x: 0, y: unit }
Because (zero :: Int) == 0
and (zero :: Unit) == unit
Or, in your particular case:
(zero :: { real :: Number, imaginary :: Number }) == { real: 0.0, imaginary: 0.0 }
Because (zero :: Number) == 0.0
Which means that writing Complex zero
is equivalent to writing Complex { real: 0.0, imaginary: 0.0 }