I have an OverridableValue<T>
class to represent a value that can be manually overriden (Contains a T Value
prop and a boolean for whether it's manual or not). This class is in use in my internal model, and in my API I have a DTO that should just hold the value without consideration for if it's manual or not.
So for example let's say I use these classes:
public class Test
{
public OverridableValue<string> Prop1 { get; set; }
public OverridableValue<int> Prop2 { get; set; }
}
public class TestDTO
{
public string Prop1 { get; set; }
public int Prop2 { get; set; }
}
Now I want to use the AutoMapper to create a mapping between the Test class and the TestDTO class. I can do this:
CreateMap<OverridableValue<string>, string>().ConvertUsing(o => o.Value);
CreateMap<OverridableValue<int>, int>().ConvertUsing(o => o.Value);
CreateMap<Test, TestDTO>();
and this will work, but I don't want to add a line for each possible generic usage of the OverridableValue class. I was wondering if there is way to create a single mapping for every single usage. Basically, I want something like this:
CreateMap<OverridableValue<T>, T>().ConvertUsing(o => o.Value);
Is there a way to do something like this?
Thanks to @LucianBargaoanu for the answer:
Instead of adding a mapping line for each possible type, the solution was to add an implicit conversion in the OverridableValue<T>
class:
public static implicit operator T(OverridableValue<T> overridableValue) => overridableValue.Value;
That worked for 99% of the cases. The only issue after that was specifically in converting OverridableValue<string>
to a string
. In this case the AutoMapper decided to use the class's ToString()
method instead of doing an implicit conversion. So to fix this I also overridden the ToString method:
public override string ToString()
{
return Value.ToString();
}