I'm really excited to see that we can apply a block assignment for set through Nunjucks. What would be the correct way to allow HTML to be passed through this approach?
I want to do the following from my initial nunjucks file:
{% set demoSetBlock %}
<div class="mClass">
<p>a header value in a nunjucks set block</p>
</div>
{% endset %}
I then want to call it into my nunjucks template like so...
{{demoSetBlock}}
but...it's printing out the content along with the HTML markup on the web page, just like this...
<div class="mClass"> <p>a header value in a nunjucks set block</p> </div>
How can we render this so that it shows it as...
a header value in a nunjucks set block
Not sure if this is the official way of resolving the situation, but what appears to be working for me now is using |safe as an attribute when the set block is called, like so:
{{demoSetBlock|safe}}
as a result, my HTML is perfectly rendered on the browser.
This is helpful in cases
_include-header.njk
, _include-footer.njk
) that are directly attached to my main template file. I could then use set block for one of these files.