I am trying to do the exercises on this tutorial about CLOS using SBCL and Slime (Emacs).
I have this class, instance, and function to set values for the slots:
(defclass point ()
(x y z))
(defvar my-point
(make-instance 'point))
(defun with-slots-set-point-values (point a b c)
(with-slots (x y z) point (setf x a y b z c)))
Using the REPL, it works fine:
CL-USER> (with-slots-set-point-values my-point 111 222 333)
333
CL-USER> (describe my-point)
#<POINT {1003747793}>
[standard-object]
Slots with :INSTANCE allocation:
X = 111
Y = 222
Z = 333
; No value
Now, the exercises indicates that using the symbol-macrolet I need to implement my version of with-slots.
I have a partial implementation of my with-slots (I still need to insert add the operation):
(defun partial-my-with-slots (slot-list object)
(mapcar #'(lambda (alpha beta) (list alpha beta))
slot-list
(mapcar #'(lambda (var) (slot-value object var)) slot-list)))
It works when calling it:
CL-USER> (partial-my-with-slots '(x y z) my-point)
((X 111) (Y 222) (Z 333))
Since this use of symbol-macrolet works:
CL-USER> (symbol-macrolet ((x 111) (y 222) (z 333))
(+ x y z))
666
I tried doing:
CL-USER> (symbol-macrolet (partial-my-with-slots '(x y z) my-point)
(+ x y z))
But, for some reason that I do not know, Slime throws the error:
malformed symbol/expansion pair: PARTIAL-MY-WITH-SLOTS
[Condition of type SB-INT:SIMPLE-PROGRAM-ERROR]
Why does this happen? How can I fix this?
You can't write with-slots as a function which is called at run time. Instead it needs to be a function which takes source code as an argument and returns other source code. In particular if given this argument
(my-with-slots (x ...) <something> <form> ...)
It should return this result:
(let ((<invisible-variable> <something))
(symbol-macrolet ((x (slot-value <invisible-variable>)) ...)
<form> ...))
You need <invisible-variable> so you evaluate <object-form> only once.
Well, here is a function which does most of that:
(defun mws-expander (form)
(destructuring-bind (mws (&rest slot-names) object-form &rest forms) form
(declare (ignore mws))
`(let ((<invisible-variable> ,object-form))
(symbol-macrolet ,(mapcar (lambda (slot-name)
`(,slot-name (slot-value <invisible-variable>
',slot-name)))
slot-names)
,@forms))))
And you can check this:
> (mws-expander '(my-with-slots (x y) a (list x y)))
(let ((<invisible-variable> a))
(symbol-macrolet ((x (slot-value <invisible-variable> 'x))
(y (slot-value <invisible-variable> 'y)))
(list x y)))
So that's almost right, except the invisible variable really needs to be invisible:
(defun mws-expander (form)
(destructuring-bind (mws (&rest slot-names) object-form &rest forms) form
(declare (ignore mws))
(let ((<invisible-variable> (gensym)))
`(let ((,<invisible-variable> ,object-form))
(symbol-macrolet ,(mapcar (lambda (slot-name)
`(,slot-name (slot-value ,<invisible-variable>
',slot-name)))
slot-names)
,@forms)))))
And now:
> (mws-expander '(my-with-slots (x y) a (list x y)))
(let ((#:g1509 a))
(symbol-macrolet ((x (slot-value #:g1509 'x))
(y (slot-value #:g1509 'y)))
(list x y)))
Well, a function which takes source code as an argument and returns other source code is a macro. So, finally, we need to install this function as a macroexpander, arranging to ignore the second argument that macro functions get:
(setf (macro-function 'mws)
(lambda (form environment)
(declare (ignore environment))
(mws-expander form)))
And now:
> (macroexpand '(mws (x y) a (list x y)))
(let ((#:g1434 a))
(symbol-macrolet ((x (slot-value #:g1434 'x)) (y (slot-value #:g1434 'y)))
(list x y)))
This would be more conventionally written using defmacro, of course:
(defmacro mws ((&rest slot-names) object-form &rest forms)
(let ((<invisible-variable> (gensym)))
`(let ((,<invisible-variable> ,object-form))
(symbol-macrolet ,(mapcar (lambda (slot-name)
`(,slot-name (slot-value ,<invisible-variable> ',slot-name)))
slot-names)
,@forms))))
However the two definitions are equivalent (modulo needing some eval-whenery to make the first work properly with the compiler).