I have the following Data, each letter of the Alphabet:
Letters = ['A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E', 'F', 'G', 'H', 'I', 'J', 'K', 'L', 'M',
'N', 'O', 'P', 'Q', 'R', 'S', 'T', 'U', 'V', 'W', 'X', 'Y', 'Z']
My goal is to get the maximum number of permutations of a length of 5, with the following 3 conditions:
e.g. Permutations
['A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E']
and['A', 'B', 'F', 'G', 'H']
should not be permitted as the same 'A' and 'B' are adjacent in both permutations. However, permutations['A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E']
and['A', 'F', 'B', 'G', 'H']
should be permitted.
Each permutation has 5 elements,
[Element 1, Element 2, Element 3, Element 4, Element 5]
. The neighbours of Element 1 is only Element 2. The neighbours of Element 2 is Element 1 and Element 3. For each permutation the neighbouring pairs are:[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4], [4, 5]
. No permutation should have the same neighbouring pair as another IF and only if they are in the same element position.
Another similar example:
['A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E']
and['A', 'B', 'F', 'G', 'H']
. In the neighbouring pair of both permutations,[Element 1, Element 2]
is['A', 'B']
. As they are identical at the same Element location, the solution is not valid.
If however:
['A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E']
and['F', 'A', 'B', 'G', 'H']
. In this example, although they both have a neighbouring pair['A', 'B']
, they are found in different Element locations[Element 1, Element 2]
and[Element 2, Element 3]
respectively. Therefore, they are both valid for the solution.
I have tried two different approaches to solve this task - using itertools
with if conditions and mixed integer programming.
In terms of using itertools
, I was not able to successfully define the conditions. I tried the following style of approach, with no luck:
from itertools import permutations
AllPermutations = list(permutations(Letters, 5))
ActualPermutations = []
for Permutation in AllPermutations:
if Permutation[0:2] not in [Permutation[0:2] for Permutation in ActualPermutations]:
ActualPermutations.append(Permutation)
While with mixed integer programming, I was not able to wrap my head around the objective function, as I was not minimizing or maximizing anything. Furthermore, mixed integer programming would only give me 1 permutation that fits with the constraints.
Can you please check if that solution matches your expectations? If so, I can provide some explanation.
from itertools import combinations
def three_letters_sub_set(letters):
return combinations(letters, 3)
def adjacent_letters_sub_set(letters):
for position in range(len(letters) - 1):
adjacent_letters = (letters[position], letters[position + 1])
yield position, adjacent_letters
def fails_rule2(letters):
return any(
three_letters in existing_three_letter_tuples
for three_letters in three_letters_sub_set(letters)
)
def fails_rule3(letters):
for position, adjacent_letters in adjacent_letters_sub_set(letters):
if adjacent_letters in existing_adjacent_letters[position]:
return True
return False
n_letters = 5
existing_three_letter_tuples = set()
existing_adjacent_letters = {position: set() for position in range(n_letters - 1)}
for comb in combinations(Letters, n_letters):
if fails_rule2(comb):
continue
if fails_rule3(comb):
continue
existing_three_letter_tuples.update(three_letters_sub_set(comb))
for position, adjacent_letters in adjacent_letters_sub_set(comb):
existing_adjacent_letters[position].add(adjacent_letters)
print(comb)