I want to be able to do something on these lines (won't compile):
def logScope(logger:Logger)(operation: (implicit l:Logger) => Unit) {/* code */ operation(logger) /* code */}
def operationOne(implicit logger:Logger) {/**/}
def operationTwo(implicit logger:Logger) {/**/}
And then use it like so:
logScope(new ConsoleLogger){logger =>
operationOne
operationTwo
}
But the nearest I've come to a working solution is this:
def logScope(logger:Logger)(operation: Logger => Unit) {/* code */ operation(logger) /* code */}
def operationOne(implicit logger:Logger) {/**/}
def operationTwo(implicit logger:Logger) {/**/}
/* other code */
logScope(new ConsoleLogger){logger =>
implicit val l = logger
operationOne
operationTwo
}
I don't think the language currently allows such constructs, but still, any suggestions or workarounds to achieve similar results?
minor update: I've created a gist with a slightly expanded version of the above code with a couple of attempts at simulating this kind of literal. As of now, CheatEx's version is the best one.
In your second example try this:
logScope(Logger()) { implicit logger =>
operationOne
}
It should work fine. The logic here is that 'implicit' is an attribute of particular value inside closure, not a part of the closure's interface.