Search code examples
sqlsql-serversql-server-2012nested-loopsdatabase-performance

How to remove the nested loop join for large tables


There are 3 tables in SQL Server with large amount of data, each table contains about 100000 rows. There is one SQL to fetch rows from the three tables. Its performance is very bad.

WITH t1 AS 
(
    SELECT 
        LeadId, dbo.get_item_id(Log) AS ItemId, DateCreated AS PriceDate
    FROM 
        (SELECT 
             t.ID, t.LeadID, t.Log, t.DateCreated, f.AskingPrice
         FROM 
             t
         JOIN 
             f ON f.PKID = t.LeadID
         WHERE 
             t.Log LIKE '%xxx%') temp
)
SELECT COUNT(1)
FROM t1
JOIN s ON s.ItemID = t1.ItemId

When checking its estimated execution plan, I find it uses a nested loop join with large rows. Loot at the screenshot below. The top part in the image return 124277 rows, and the bottom part is executed 124277 times! I guess this is why it is so slow.

enter image description here

enter image description here

We know that nested loop has big performance issue with large data. How to remove it, and use hash join or other join instead?

Edit: Below is the related function.

CREATE FUNCTION [dbo].[get_item_Id](@message VARCHAR(200))
RETURNS VARCHAR(200) AS
BEGIN
    DECLARE @result VARCHAR(200),
            @index int

    --Sold in eBay (372827580038).
    SELECT @index = PatIndex('%([0-9]%)%', @message)
    IF(@index = 0)
     SELECT @result='';
    ELSE 
     SELECT @result= REPLACE(REPLACE(REPLACE(SUBSTRING(@message, PatIndex('%([0-9]%)%', @message),8000), '.', ''),'(',''),')','')
    -- Return the result of the function
    RETURN @result
END;

Solution

  • For some reason it has decided to do s cross join t1 then evaluate the function (result aliased as Expr1002) and then do a filter on [s].[ItemID]=[Expr1002] (instead of doing an equi join).

    It estimates that it will have 88,969 and 124,277 rows going into the cross join (which means it would produce 11,056,800,413)

    Executing the scalar UDF after the cross join an estimated 11 billion times and then filtering the estimated 11 billion rows down does seem crazy. If it was evaluated before the join it would be evaluated much fewer times and would also be an equi join so could also use HASH or MERGE inner joins and just read all tables once without blowing the row count up.

    I reproduced this locally and the behaviour changed when the UDF was created WITH SCHEMABINDING - SQL Server will then see that it does not access any tables and that it is deterministic in its definition.

    Trace flag 8606 output appears to support this being the issue. In both cases the "Simplified Tree" stage represents the query as a cross join with the predicate on the ScalarUdf. The scalar UDF is annotated "IsDet" or "IsNonDet" dependant on whether or not the function is schema bound. In the former case the "Project Normalization" stage pushes the calculation back up before the join and gives it an alias referenced in the join itself, in the non deterministic case this does not happen.

    I strongly suggest getting rid of this scalar function and replacing it with an inline version though as non inline scalar functions have many well known additional performance problems apart from this.

    The new function would be

    CREATE FUNCTION get_item_Id_inline (@message VARCHAR(200))
    RETURNS TABLE
    AS
        RETURN
          (SELECT item_Id = CASE
                              WHEN PatIndex('%([0-9]%)%', @message) = 0 THEN ''
                              ELSE REPLACE(REPLACE(REPLACE(SUBSTRING(@message, PatIndex('%([0-9]%)%', @message), 8000), '.', ''), '(', ''), ')', '')
                            END) 
    

    and rewritten query

    WITH t1
         AS (SELECT t.LeadID,
                    i.item_Id     AS ItemId,
                    t.DateCreated AS PriceDate
             FROM   t
                    CROSS apply dbo.get_item_Id_inline(t.Log) i
                    JOIN f
                      ON f.PKID = t.LeadID
             WHERE  t.Log LIKE '%xxx%')
    SELECT COUNT(1)
    FROM   t1
           JOIN s
             ON s.ItemID = t1.ItemId 
    

    there may still be room for some additional optimisations but this will be orders of magnitudes better than your current execution plan (as that is catastrophically bad).