I am trying to pass an image uploaded from a react app through express to a managed s3 bucket. The platform/host I am using creates and manages the s3 bucket and generates upload and access urls. This all works fine (I have tested a generated upload url in postman with an image in a binary body and it worked perfectly).
My problem is passing the image through express. I am using multer to get the image from the form but I am assuming multer is turning that image into some kind of file object and s3 is expecting some sort of blob or stream.
In following code, the image in req.file exists, I get a 200 response from s3 with no errors and when I visit the asset url the url works, but the image itself is missing.
const router = Router();
const upload = multer()
router.post('/', upload.single('file'), async (req, res) => {
console.log(req.file)
const asset = req.file
const assetPath = req.headers['asset-path']
let s3URLs = await getPresignedURLS(assetPath)
const sendAsset = await fetch(
s3URLs.urls[0].upload_url, // the s3 upload url
{
method: 'PUT',
headers: {
"Content-Type": asset.mimetype
},
body: asset,
redirect: 'follow'
}
)
console.log("s3 response", sendAsset)
res.status(200).json({"url": s3URLs.urls[0].access_url });
});
export default router;
I am not sure what to do to convert what multer gives me to something that aws s3 will accept. I am also open to getting rid of multer if there is an easier way to upload binary files to express.
For anyone that ever stumbles across this question the solution was to create an custom multer storage engine. Inside the engine you get access to the file with a stream property that s3 accepted (with the correct headers).