Search code examples
functionhaskelltypesalgebraic-data-typescustom-data-type

Is a Haskell type constructor 'just' a function?


I am going through "Haskell Programming from first principles" and found an exercise asking if the following [code slightly edited here] was valid:

module Test where

type Subject = String
type Verb = String
type Object = String

data Sentence = 
  Sentence Subject Verb Object
  deriving (Eq, Show)

a1 = Sentence "I" "like" "cheese"
a2 = Sentence "I" "scream"

My expectation was initially that the code would fail, because in the definition of a2, Sentence only had two arguments. But found that GHCi was happy to load the module. I did a little experimentation and found that I could now type

a3 = a2 "icecream"

and a3 (typed into GHCi) would print Sentence "I" "scream" "icecream". Also, if I inquire the types of a2 I get a2 :: Object -> Sentence. So if I understand correctly, a2 is behaving exactly like a partially-applied function.

Question therefore is: Is a type constructor really just a function (that returns a type value) in all situations - distinguished from a 'normal' function only in that it has to start with an upper-case character?


Solution

  • First off, what you're talking about here are data constructors, not type constructors. The example happens to contain both a (nullary) type constructor Sentence and a ternary data constructor Sentence. To make it clear which is which:

    data SentenceTC = SentenceDC Subject Verb Object
    

    SentenceTC is a type constructor, SentenceDC is a data constructor.

    So, the question is:

    Is SentenceDC just a function?

    and the answer is, it is a function, but not “just” a function. It is specifically an injective function, i.e. every combination of arguments leads to a different result. Because of that, it is always possible to infer which arguments it was, from the resulting SentenceTC value. And that's what happens when you pattern match on a constructor.

    a1Verb :: Verb
    a1Verb = case a1 of
        Sentence _ v _ -> v
    

    This would not be possible with a general function, like

    n' :: Int
    n' = abs n
     where n = -3
    
    nNew :: Int
    nNew = case n' of
       abs n -> n   -- error, `abs` can not be used as a pattern match
    

    And that wouldn't make sense either, because there are actually two different numbers whose abs is equal to n' (namely, -3 and 3).

    But yeah, SentenceDC is a function, you can do everything with it that you could do with other functions of type String -> String -> String -> SentenceTC. Not the other way around though: not everything you can do with a data constructor can also be done with a general function of the same type.