I am considering to use the executable file generated by either Dymola (dymosim.exe) or OpenModelica (model_name.exe) to make parametric simulations on the same model. I was wondering, is there any difference in the two .exe files and related input files? (which are dsin.txt for Dymola, and model_name_init.xml for OpenModelica).
Regarding file sizes, I can see that the Dymola files are smaller. But I was also wondering about speed of execution and flexibility of the input files for scripting. Lastly, since Dymola is a commercial software, is the dymosim.exe file publicly shareable?
I will write this for OpenModelica, the Dymola people can add their own.
I would suggest to use FMUs instead of executables and some (co)simulation framework like OMSimulator (via Python scripting) or some other ones (PyFMI, etc). See an example here: https://www.openmodelica.org/doc/OMSimulator/master/html/OMSimulatorPython.html#example-pi
Note that if you have resources such as tables, etc, these will be put inside the FMU if you use Modelica URIs: modelica://LibraryName/Resource/blah. However, for the generated executables you would need to ship them with the exe and they would need to be in a specific directory on the other machine. Also, you would need to ship dependent DLLs for the executables for the the FMUs that is (mostly - not true if you have external dlls that you call in your model) not needed as they are statically compiled.
Simulation speed depends on the model sometimes one or the other is faster.
For what libraries are supported by OpenModelica you can check the library coverage: https://libraries.openmodelica.org/branches/overview-combined.html
If you still want to use executables, here is a list of command line parameters for them: https://www.openmodelica.org/doc/OpenModelicaUsersGuide/latest/simulationflags.html
How to do parameter sweeps via executables: https://openmodelica.org/doc/OpenModelicaUsersGuide/latest/scripting_api.html#simulation-parameter-sweep