In the following C++20 function template:
template<int i>
void f() {
if constexpr (i == 1)
g();
else if constexpr (i == 2)
h();
else
??? // <--error
}
Is there something we can write in ???
such that a call of f<3>()
will fail at compile-time?
The problem is that the discarded statement of constexpr if can't be ill-formed for every possible specialization. [temp.res.general]/6
(emphasis mine)
The validity of a template may be checked prior to any instantiation.
The program is ill-formed, no diagnostic required, if:
- no valid specialization can be generated for a template or a substatement of a constexpr if statement within a template and the template is not instantiated, or
You can use a type-dependent expression that is always false
. E.g.
template<int i> struct dependent_false : std::false_type {};
template<int i>
void f() {
if constexpr (i == 1)
g();
else if constexpr (i == 2)
h();
else
static_assert(dependent_false<i>::value, "Must be 1 or 2");
}