I'm able to unify the following terms:
foo :: (a -> b -> c) -> a -> b -> c
bar :: (a' -> b') -> a' -> b'
foo bar
a ~ (a' -> b')
b ~ a'
c ~ b'
(a' -> b') -> a' -> b'
But I'm stuck applying the correct rules for the following unification, because foo
expects a ternary function but bar
has only two arguments:
foo :: (a -> b -> c -> d) -> a -> b -> c -> d
bar :: (a' -> b') -> a' -> b'
foo bar
-- ...?
(a' -> c -> d) -> a' -> c -> d
The inferred type comes from GHCI. How do I get there?
because
foo
expects a ternary function butbar
has only two arguments
Well, always remember that Haskell doesn't really have binary or ternary functions at all – it just has unary ones. A ternary function is actually a unary function whose result is a unary function whose result is a function.
In this case, bar'
must “fake” an extra argument by having b'
be a function type. This is a special version of bar:
-- b' ~ (d -> e)
bar :: (a' -> d -> e) -> a' -> d -> e
and voilà, bar
has three arguments.
Now it should be clear how to unify this with the argument to foo
.