I try to fit good oop behaviour in my code and was wondering the following:
I generally have this kind of a class design:
class MyClass():
def __init__(self,arg1):
self.arg1 = arg1
@property
def arg1(self):
return _arg1
@arg1.setter
def arg1(self, value):
self._arg1 = value
If I now write a function which has a dict and uses this dict for setting class attributes:
def set_my_dict(self):
argdict = {'arg1':4}
for k, v in argdict:
setattr(self, k, v)
Does this setattr
call, in this situation, the setter for possible type checks etc?
I was interested as well, so i opened up ipython and added pdb to the setter method to test.
In [5]: class MyClass():
...: def __init__(self,arg1):
...: self.arg1 = arg1
...:
...: @property
...: def arg1(self):
...: return _arg1
...:
...: @arg1.setter
...: def arg1(self, value):
...: import pdb;
...: pdb.set_trace();
...: self._arg1 = value
...:
In [6]: xr = MyClass(2)
> <ipython-input-5-21bab018f5a2>(13)arg1()
-> self._arg1 = value
(Pdb) c
In [7]: setattr(xr, "arg1", 3)
> <ipython-input-5-21bab018f5a2>(13)arg1()
-> self._arg1 = value
(Pdb) c
The setter function is used at both at instantiation and when using the setattr. neat.