I'd like to understand what makes ClearCase create paths like these (more than one @@):
\TUNE\Integration\XmlFiles\PM_Content@@\main\integ_mp1601\4\CommunityLink.png@@\main\integ_mp151\151x\1
Rather than the more typical (single @@):
\TUNE\Integration\XmlFiles\PM_Content\CommunityLink.png@@\main\integ_mp160\160x\1
I don't seem to have a control over it and it is not immediately obvious to me why CC does that. And when it happens there seems to be nothing I can do to "convince" it to use the simpler format.
First, a bit of context:
'@@
' is linked with dynamic views
You can see that concept with version extended path: using a pathname_ccase
syntax, you can add characters to the end of a relative or full path name, turning it into a VOB-extended path name.
VOB-extended path names that specify versions of elements are the most commonly used; they are called version-extended path names.
/vobs/proj/foo.c@@/main/motif/4
That means you can:
The idea is: in a dynamic view, you can access (read the content of) any version of a file through the extended pathname.
Now, why multiple '@@
'?
The documentation adds:
This symbol is required to effect a switch from the standard
file/directory
namespace to the extendedelement/branch/version
namespace.There are two equivalent ways to think of
@@
:
- When appended to the name of any element, the extended naming symbol turns off transparency (automatic version-selection).
Thus, you must specify one of the element's versions explicitly.- The extended naming symbol is part of an element's official name.
For example,foo.c
is the name of a version (the particular version that appears in the view);foo.c@@
is the name of the element itself.
So with:
TUNE\Integration\XmlFiles\PM_Content@@\main\integ_mp1601\4\CommunityLink.png@@\main\integ_mp151\151x\1
You have:
PM_Content@@
the name of the element (folder) PM_Content
at its version \main\integ_mp1601\4
CommunityLink.png@@
the name of the element (gile) CommunityLink.png
at its version \main\integ_mp151\151x\1
That happens when the current PM_Content
folder, visible in the view, no longer lists CommunityLink.png
(which was deleted/rmname'd):