(This is a follow-on to Sum vector with range-v3)
If I have two (or more) vectors, I can zip
them together with range-v3
like this:
std::vector< int > v1{1,1,1};
std::vector< int > v2{2,2,2};
auto v = ranges::views::zip( v1, v2 )
| ranges::views::transform( ... );
This works well, but in practice, I don't have explicit vectors, but I do have a vector of vectors. I'd like to do the following, but it doesn't give the same result. (In fact, I'm not sure what the result is, and I don't know how to determine what the result is!)
std::vector< std::vector< int > > V{{1,1,1},{2,2,2}};
auto vV = ranges::views::zip( V )
| ranges::views::transform( ... );
What can I do to zip a vector< vector >
like I did to zip a few explicit vectors? I've tried using join
along with stride
, chunk
, etc. but haven't found the magic combination.
I suppose if you don't know the size of external vector
in compile time the only reasonable solution that remains is work around it. Instead of trying to zip
it I would suggest going with accumulate
on top of that as it seems more versatile in this situation.
std::vector< std::vector< int > > V{{1,1,1},{2,2,2}};
auto vV = ranges::accumulate(
V,
std::vector<ResultType>(V[0].size()),
[](const auto& acc, const auto& next) {
auto range = ranges::views::zip(acc, next) | ranges::views::transform(...);
return std::vector<int>(range.begin(), range.end());
}
)
EDIT: I forgot the range has to be copied.