I wrote my own iterator for the class that I'm working on which extends hash
.
The iterator that I wrote was achieved using blocks and now im trying to achieve the same exact thing using Proc
. but I kinda don't know how to use it in this context! :(
def each_word
rank=0
self.sort_by{|k,v| v}.reverse.to_h.keys.each{ |key,abs, rel | yield rank+=1,
key,self[key], self.frequency(key) if block_given? }#iterate with aid block
end
and i would use it like this :
puts "Rang - Anzahl - Häufigkeit(%) - Wort"
obj1.each_word do |rank,word,abs ,rel|
puts "#{rank} #{abs} #{rel}% #{word} "
end
problem is that i want to have the same code using Proc
def each_letter
rank=0
x=self.sort_by{|k,v| v}.reverse.to_h# this wont work but wrote it as helpless try
my_proc=Proc new { |key,abs, rel | yield rank+=1, key,x[key], x.frequency(key) }
my_proc.call()
end
I already looked up those pages
so what is the correct way to use the provided block using letters?!
each_word
iterate over the words found using the method and a block, starting with the most common word to the least common word. The block gets the word, the absolute and relative frequency passed.(which I assume I did correctly)The letter statics
each_letter
It behaves similarly toeach_word
, but within the method, you should use aProc
instead of ablock
.
What your doing here in your attempt is wrapping yield with a Proc, but in reality you can replace yield with the Proc:
def each_word(&proc)
rank=0
keys = self.sort_by{|k,v| v}.reverse.to_h.keys
keys.each do |key, abs, rel|
if proc
proc.call(rank+=1, key,self[key], self.frequency(key))
end
end
end
What &proc
does it take the block that is passed in (whether with do ... end
or { ... }
syntax) and converts it to a proc.
To check whether a block was given, you would simply use if proc
(whereas if you were using yield, you'd use block_given?
). You could alternatively use proc&.call
which is the safe navigation operator.
By the way, you should probably change rank +=1
to rank + 1
, there's no no point reassigning the variable's value here since it's not going to change the value in the hash anyway (numbers are immutable).