I have a (new) question related to expss tables. I wrote a very simple UDF (that relies on few expss functions), as follows:
library(expss)
z_indices <- function(x, m_global, std_global, weight=NULL){
if(is.null(weight)) weight = rep(1, length(x))
z <- (w_mean(x, weight)-m_global)/std_global
indices <- 100+(z*100)
return(indices)
}
Reproducible example, based on infert
dataset (plus a vector of arbitrary weights):
data(infert)
infert$w <- as.vector(x=rep(2, times=nrow(infert)), mode='numeric')
infert %>%
tab_cells(age, parity) %>%
tab_cols(total(), education, case %nest% list(total(), education)) %>%
tab_weight(w) %>%
tab_stat_valid_n(label="N") %>%
tab_stat_mean(label="Mean") %>%
tab_stat_fun(label="Z", function(x, m_global, std_global, weight=NULL){
z_indices(x, m_global=w_mean(infert$age, infert$w),std_global=w_sd(infert$age, infert$w))
}) %>%
tab_pivot(stat_position="inside_columns")
The table is computed and the output for the first line is (almost) as expected.
Then things go messy for the second line, since both arguments of z_indices
explicitely refer to infert$age
, where infert$parity
is expected.
My question: is there a way to dynamically pass the variables of tab_cells
as function argument within tab_stat_fun
to match the variable being processed? I guess this happens inside function declaration but have not clue how to proceed...
Thanks!
EDIT April 28th 2020: Answer from @Gregory Demin works great in the scope of infert dataset, although for better scalability to larger dataframes I wrote the following loop:
var_df <- data.frame("age"=infert$age, "parity"=infert$parity)
tabZ=infert
for(each in names(var_df)){
tabZ = tabZ %>%
tab_cells(var_df[each]) %>%
tab_cols(total(), education) %>%
tab_weight(w) %>%
tab_stat_valid_n(label="N") %>%
tab_stat_mean(label="Mean") %>%
tab_stat_fun(label="Z", function(x, m_global, std_global, weight=NULL){
z_indices(x, m_global=w_mean(var_df[each], infert$w),std_global=w_sd(var_df[each], infert$w))
})
}
tabZ = tabZ %>% tab_pivot()
Hope this inspires other expss users in the future!
There is no universal solution for this case. Function in the tab_stat_fun
is always calculated inside cell so you can't get global values in it.
However, in your case we can calculate z-index before summarizing. Not so flexible solution but it works:
# function for weighted z-score
w_z_index = function(x, weight = NULL){
if(is.null(weight)) weight = rep(1, length(x))
z <- (x - w_mean(x, weight))/w_sd(x, weight)
indices <- 100+(z*100)
return(indices)
}
data(infert)
infert$w <- rep(2, times=nrow(infert))
infert %>%
tab_cells(age, parity) %>%
tab_cols(total(), education, case %nest% list(total(), education)) %>%
tab_weight(w) %>%
tab_stat_valid_n(label="N") %>%
tab_stat_mean(label="Mean") %>%
# here we get z-index instead of original variables
tab_cells(age = w_z_index(age, w), parity = w_z_index(parity, w)) %>%
tab_stat_mean(label="Z") %>%
tab_pivot(stat_position="inside_columns")
UPDATE. A little more scalable approach:
w_z_index = function(x, weight = NULL){
if(is.null(weight)) weight = rep(1, length(x))
z <- (x - w_mean(x, weight))/w_sd(x, weight)
indices <- 100+(z*100)
return(indices)
}
w_z_index_df = function(df, weight = NULL){
df[] = lapply(df, w_z_index, weight = weight)
df
}
data(infert)
infert$w <- rep(2, times=nrow(infert))
infert %>%
tab_cells(age, parity) %>%
tab_cols(total(), education, case %nest% list(total(), education)) %>%
tab_weight(w) %>%
tab_stat_valid_n(label="N") %>%
tab_stat_mean(label="Mean") %>%
# here we get z-index instead of original variables
# we process a lot of variables at once
tab_cells(w_z_index_df(data.frame(age, parity))) %>%
tab_stat_mean(label="Z") %>%
tab_pivot(stat_position="inside_columns")