What is wrong in this code?
#include <map>
template<typename T>
struct TMap
{
typedef std::map<T, T> Type;
};
template<typename T>
T test(typename TMap<T>::Type &tmap_) { return 0.0; }
int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[])
{
TMap<double>::Type tmap;
tmap[1.1] = 5.2;
double d = test(tmap); //Error: could not deduce template argument for T
return 0;
}
That is non-deducible context. That is why the template argument cannot be deduced by the compiler.
Just imagine if you might have specialized TMap
as follows:
template <>
struct TMap<SomeType>
{
typedef std::map <double, double> Type;
};
How would the compiler deduce the type SomeType
, given that TMap<SomeType>::Type
is std::map<double, double>
? It cannot. It's not guaranteed that the type which you use in std::map
is also the type in TMap
. The compiler cannot make this dangerous assumption. There may not any relation between the type arguments, whatsoever.
Also, you might have another specialization of TMap
defined as:
template <>
struct TMap<OtherType>
{
typedef std::map <double, double> Type;
};
This makes the situation even worse. Now you've the following:
TMap<SomeType>::Type
= std::map<double, double>
. TMap<OtherType>::Type
= std::map<double, double>
. Now ask yourself: given TMap<T>::Type
is std::map<double, double>
, how would the compiler know whether T
is SomeType
or OtherType
? It cannot even know how many such choices it has, neither can it know the choices themselves...
I'm just asking you for the sake of thought-experiment (assuming it can know the complete set of choices).