This is my first ever post to SO and am very new to C# with most of my IT experience in databases. I am starting to look at some of our code and would like to understand how I would use this class and it methods for resusability purposes.
public class FileCreator
{
public string Territory { get; set; }
public string CV { get; set; }
public string AdDate { get; set; }
public string Category { get; set; }
public string Advertiser { get; set; }
public string Brand { get; set; }
public decimal SumOfSpend { get; set; }
public decimal SumOfVolume { get; set; }
public string Spots { get; set; }
public string PageNumber { get; set; }
internal static List<FileCreator> Create(DataSet data)
{
var result = new List<FileCreator>();
if (data.Tables.Count > 0)
{
result = Create(data.Tables[0]);
}
return result;
}
public static List<FileCreator> Create(DataTable dataTable)
{
var result = new List<FileCreator>();
foreach (DataRow row in dataTable.Rows)
{
result.Add(Create(row));
}
return result;
}
private static FileCreator Create(DataRow row)
{
var fileCreator = new FileCreator();
fileCreator.Territory = (row["Territory"].ToString());
fileCreator.CV = row["CV"].ToString();
fileCreator.AdDate = row["Ad_date"].ToString();
fileCreator.Category = row["Category"].ToString();
fileCreator.Advertiser = row["Advertiser"].ToString();
fileCreator.Brand = row["Brand"].ToString();
fileCreator.SumOfSpend = Convert.ToDecimal(row["SumOfSpend"].ToString());
fileCreator.SumOfVolume = Convert.ToDecimal(row["SumOfVolume"].ToString());
fileCreator.Spots = row["Spots"].ToString();
fileCreator.PageNumber = row["Page Number"].ToString();
return fileCreator;
}
}
Why not just create a new instance of a datatable i.e. var dt = new Datatable()?
I must be missing the point of this approach. How will I benefit from this approach when I normally just create multiple datatables?
Go easy. It's my first post 🙂
Thank you
The point of this is get a strongly typed class instead of relying on hard-coded strings to get the data out and then casting everything to the type you are expecting. Instead, its taking data from the Datatable and transforming it to a "Dto" (Data Transfer Object) where you know all the properties (columns) that exist and their types because they are explicitly declared. There is no guessing! :)
While the given approach here works, I hope it is more for legacy sake. It is more efficient to simply create this Dto class directly instead of creating a Datatable and then mapping it.