How to format a nested multiple-value-bind the let way?

Question

Recently, I've been often nesting several functions that return multiple values. However, unlike let, which me allows to write these calls elegantly into one big statement, I always end up with a lot of indentation.

My question is: having several multiple-valued functions such as

(defun return-1-and-2 ()
  (values 1 2))

(defun return-3-and-4 ()
  (values 3 4))

is it possible to achieve the same as

(multiple-value-bind (one two)
    (return-1-and-2)
  (multiple-value-bind (three four)
      (return-3-and-4)
    (list one two three four)))

but write it more concisely the let-way, i.e., something like

(multiple-let (((one two) (return-1-and-2))
               ((three four) (return-3-and-4)))
  (list one two three four))

?

Answer 1

Probably there are similar constructs in libraries.

Note that it is more similar to let*, not let, since scope is nested.

One could write a macro. For example:

(defmacro multiple-value-let* ((&rest bindings) &body body)

  "Sets the scope for several ((var-0 ... var-n) form)
  binding clauses, using the multiple return values of the form."

  (if (null bindings)
      `(progn ,@body)
    (destructuring-bind (((&rest vars) form) &rest rest-bindings)
        bindings
      `(multiple-value-bind ,vars
           ,form
         (multiple-value-let* ,rest-bindings
           ,@body)))))

Example:

CL-USER 33 > (walker:walk-form
              '(multiple-value-let* (((one two)    (return-1-and-2))
                                     ((three four) (return-3-and-4)))
                 (list one two three four)))
(MULTIPLE-VALUE-BIND (ONE TWO)
    (RETURN-1-AND-2)
  (MULTIPLE-VALUE-BIND (THREE FOUR)
      (RETURN-3-AND-4)
    (PROGN (LIST ONE TWO THREE FOUR))))