Search code examples
c++pointersdestructorsmart-pointers

Do Primitive Types in C++ have destructors?

This question comes from me trying to understand the motivation for smart pointers where you make a wrapper class around the pointer so that you could add a custom destructor. Do pointers (and ints, bools, doubles, etc.) not have a destructor?

Solution

  • Primitive types (and compounds thereof) have trivial destructors. These don't do anything, and have special wording that allows them to be skipped altogether in some cases.

    This, however, is orthogonal to why C++ has smart pointers. A raw pointer is non-owning: it points at another object, but does not affect its lifetime. Smart pointers, on the other hand, own (or share ownership of) their pointee, tying its lifetime to their own. This is what is implemented inside, among other special functions, their destructor.