I developed my custom connector with dev-kit, my connector act as a source it connect to ejb and extract the data, and send to the another end point.
I am using bitronix for transaction manager.
I used the below code to register my ejb in the mule transaction context.
public static void registerXaResource(MuleContext muleContext) {
EJBClientTransactionContext txContext = EJBClientTransactionContext.create(muleContext.getTransactionManager(),
getSynchronizationRegistry());
EJBClientTransactionContext.setGlobalContext(txContext);
XaResourceProducer.registerXAResource("dummyResource", new DummyXaResource());
}
/**
* @return
*/
private static TransactionSynchronizationRegistry getSynchronizationRegistry() {
return TransactionManagerServices.getTransactionSynchronizationRegistry();
}
After that am using next end point as JMS and configured with XA,always join. But it not behave as XA. It looks like bitronix delisting the JMS resource.
2019-12-11 16:59:48,398 [Receiving Thread] DEBUG
bitronix.tm.resource.jms.DualSessionWrapper - choosing XA session
2019-12-11 16:59:48,410 [Receiving Thread] DEBUG bitronix.tm.resource.jms.DualSessionWrapper - looking for producer based on a MessageProducerConsumerKey on ActiveMQQueue[sampleReplyQueue]
2019-12-11 16:59:48,410 [Receiving Thread] DEBUG bitronix.tm.resource.jms.DualSessionWrapper - found no producer based on a MessageProducerConsumerKey on ActiveMQQueue[sampleReplyQueue], creating it
2019-12-11 16:59:48,411 [Receiving Thread] DEBUG bitronix.tm.resource.jms.DualSessionWrapper - choosing XA session
2019-12-11 16:59:48,447 [Receiving Thread] DEBUG bitronix.tm.resource.jms.DualSessionWrapper - closing a DualSessionWrapper in state ACCESSIBLE of a JmsPooledConnection of pool 1605822565-inboundtest-JMS in state ACCESSIBLE with underlying connection org.apache.activemq.artemis.jms.client.ActiveMQXAConnection@207dd1b7
2019-12-11 16:59:48,447 [Receiving Thread] DEBUG bitronix.tm.resource.common.TransactionContextHelper - delisting a DualSessionWrapper in state ACCESSIBLE of a JmsPooledConnection of pool 1605822565-inboundtest-JMS in state ACCESSIBLE with underlying connection org.apache.activemq.artemis.jms.client.ActiveMQXAConnection@207dd1b7 from a Bitronix Transaction with GTRID [31363035383232353635000000002582E13C00000001], status=ACTIVE, 1 resource(s) enlisted (started Thu Jan 08 12:18:54 IST 1970)
2019-12-11 16:59:48,447 [Receiving Thread] DEBUG bitronix.tm.resource.common.TransactionContextHelper - resource is not in enlisting global transaction context: a DualSessionWrapper in state ACCESSIBLE of a JmsPooledConnection of pool 1605822565-inboundtest-JMS in state ACCESSIBLE with underlying connection org.apache.activemq.artemis.jms.client.ActiveMQXAConnection@207dd1b7
2019-12-11 16:59:48,447 [Receiving Thread] DEBUG bitronix.tm.resource.common.TransactionContextHelper - requeuing a DualSessionWrapper in state ACCESSIBLE of a JmsPooledConnection of pool 1605822565-inboundtest-JMS in state ACCESSIBLE with underlying connection org.apache.activemq.artemis.jms.client.ActiveMQXAConnection@207dd1b7 from a Bitronix Transaction with GTRID [31363035383232353635000000002582E13C00000001], status=ACTIVE, 1 resource(s) enlisted (started Thu Jan 08 12:18:54 IST 1970)
2019-12-11 16:59:48,447 [Receiving Thread] DEBUG bitronix.tm.resource.common.TransactionContextHelper - resource is not in enlisting global transaction context: a DualSessionWrapper in state ACCESSIBLE of a JmsPooledConnection of pool 1605822565-inboundtest-JMS in state ACCESSIBLE with underlying connection org.apache.activemq.artemis.jms.client.ActiveMQXAConnection@207dd1b7
As per the logs the JMS not comes under the transaction which i begin.
Or else right way to implement XA Mule custom connector.
Devkit doesn't support transactions. Probably just registering the resource in that way is not enough to fully implement the XA transaction.
The SDK for Mule 4 does support transactions though I understand this is not the version you are interested.