Hello statisticians and data enthusiasts !!
I am working on a dataset to apply linear discriminant analysis on it. And i'm having trouble to finding out columns with good enough normal distributions score of shapiro.test, because all the p-values are up-to the mark of 0.05.
Below is the shapiro.test results on my Data
statistic p.value
Id 0.9548438 7.972013e-21
MSSubClass 0.8045693 9.108194e-39
LotFrontage 0.8804029 2.001693e-29
LotArea 0.3510589 7.933654e-58
OverallQual 0.9480078 2.686457e-22
OverallCond 0.8289229 6.774229e-37
YearBuilt 0.9255974 2.77022e-26
YearRemodAdd 0.8628004 6.72028e-34
MasVnrArea 0.639286 6.556645e-48
BsmtFinSF1 0.8479603 2.813854e-35
BsmtFinSF2 0.3272826 1.850254e-58
BsmtUnfSF 0.9304219 1.639911e-25
TotalBsmtSF 0.917352 1.611332e-27
X1stFlrSF 0.9269462 4.513223e-26
X2ndFlrSF 0.7668042 2.514882e-41
LowQualFinSF 0.09799004 9.589248e-64
GrLivArea 0.9279825 6.597611e-26
BsmtFullBath 0.6582952 3.760666e-47
BsmtHalfBath 0.2429119 1.466616e-60
FullBath 0.7193559 4.231488e-44
HalfBath 0.6380019 4.581582e-48
BedroomAbvGr 0.849803 4.115551e-35
KitchenAbvGr 0.2197959 4.221203e-61
TotRmsAbvGrd 0.9422768 2.004964e-23
Fireplaces 0.7552301 4.83098e-42
GarageYrBlt 0.9209432 2.816783e-26
GarageCars 0.8353703 2.301685e-36
GarageArea 0.9753273 4.016963e-15
WoodDeckSF 0.7685159 3.227985e-41
OpenPorchSF 0.7271672 1.135905e-43
EnclosedPorch 0.4144382 4.849485e-56
X3SsnPorch 0.09493385 8.307268e-64
ScreenPorch 0.2982077 3.305688e-59
PoolArea 0.04120243 7.111538e-65
MiscVal 0.05823268 1.529907e-64
MoSold 0.968784 3.178973e-17
YrSold 0.8970975 3.420194e-30
SalePrice 0.8696715 3.206142e-33
Histogram of all desired columns
But i'm having trouble interpreting these results, as i'm new to stats and R language.
Kindly guide to interpret this accurately in order to find Normally distributed columns.
in order to understand the p-value you have to understand what the corresponding statistical test is actually testing.
In case of the Shapiro-Wilk Normality Test the null hypothesis is the underlying data has a normal distribution. The p-value then measures (more or less) how likely this is. Often we accept the null hypothesis if the p-value is greater or equal than 0.05. This means that in only 5% of the cases we reject the null hypothesis although it would be correct (Type I error).
In your case none of the p-values is anywhere near to be accepted. And a brief look at the histograms reveals that indeed none of the variables seem to have a normal distribution. A normal distribution would rather look like this:
The histogram should be symmetric and bell-shaped. Hope this helps.