Search code examples
phpperformancememoryforeachexplode

Performance comparison: call explode() in foreach() signature versus passing exploded data as a variable to foreach()


foreach(explode(',' $foo) as $bar) { ... }

vs

$test = explode(',' $foo);
foreach($test as $bar) { ... }

In the first example, does it explode the $foo string for each iteration or does PHP keep it in memory exploded in its own temporary variable? From an efficiency point of view, does it make sense to create the extra variable $test or are both pretty much equal?


Solution

  • I could make an educated guess, but let's try it out!

    I figured there were three main ways to approach this.

    1. explode and assign before entering the loop
    2. explode within the loop, no assignment
    3. string tokenize

    My hypotheses:

    1. probably consume more memory due to assignment
    2. probably identical to #1 or #3, not sure which
    3. probably both quicker and much smaller memory footprint

    Approach

    Here's my test script:

    <?php
    
    ini_set('memory_limit', '1024M');
    
    $listStr = 'text';
    $listStr .= str_repeat(',text', 9999999);
    
    $timeStart = microtime(true);
    
    /*****
     * {INSERT LOOP HERE}
     */
    
    $timeEnd = microtime(true);
    $timeElapsed = $timeEnd - $timeStart;
    
    printf("Memory used: %s kB\n", memory_get_peak_usage()/1024);
    printf("Total time: %s s\n", $timeElapsed);
    

    And here are the three versions:

    1)

    // explode separately 
    $arr = explode(',', $listStr);
    foreach ($arr as $val) {}
    

    2)

    // explode inline-ly 
    foreach (explode(',', $listStr) as $val) {}
    

    3)

    // tokenize
    $tok = strtok($listStr, ',');
    while ($tok = strtok(',')) {}
    

    Results

    explode() benchmark results

    Conclusions

    Looks like some assumptions were disproven. Don't you love science? :-)

    • In the big picture, any of these methods is sufficiently fast for a list of "reasonable size" (few hundred or few thousand).
    • If you're iterating over something huge, time difference is relatively minor but memory usage could be different by an order of magnitude!
    • When you explode() inline without pre-assignment, it's a fair bit slower for some reason.
    • Surprisingly, tokenizing is a bit slower than explicitly iterating a declared array. Working on such a small scale, I believe that's due to the call stack overhead of making a function call to strtok() every iteration. More on this below.

    In terms of number of function calls, explode()ing really tops tokenizing. O(1) vs O(n)

    I added a bonus to the chart where I run method 1) with a function call in the loop. I used strlen($val), thinking it would be a relatively similar execution time. That's subject to debate, but I was only trying to make a general point. (I only ran strlen($val) and ignored its output. I did not assign it to anything, for an assignment would be an additional time-cost.)

    // explode separately 
    $arr = explode(',', $listStr);
    foreach ($arr as $val) {strlen($val);}
    

    As you can see from the results table, it then becomes the slowest method of the three.

    Final thought

    This is interesting to know, but my suggestion is to do whatever you feel is most readable/maintainable. Only if you're really dealing with a significantly large dataset should you be worried about these micro-optimizations.