Are there any anti-pattern names for writing code like this?

Question

Here is some code that uses a parameter class to contain the possible parameters to the Show() method. The values in this FooOption class aren't very related. You can see this by looking at the implementation of Show() below. I know this is bad code, but are there any anti-patterns related to doing this?

class FooOptions {
  public int? Id { get; set; }
  public string BazContext { get; set; }
  public int? BazId { get; set; }
}

class BarMgr {
  public Bar Show(FooOptions options) {
    if (options == null)
      options = new FooOptions();
    if (options.Id.HasValue)
      return svc.GetBar(options.Id.Value);
    if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(options.BazContext) && options.BazId.HasValue)
      return svc.GetBar(options.BazContext, options.BazId.Value);
    return null;
  }
}

Update: I know that parameter objects are not an anti-pattern. In my experience, parameter object properties are related. This is the possible anti-pattern that I am trying to locate. setting all three properties makes no sense.

Answer 1

After your update, here my answer:
As far as I know, there is no real name for an anti-pattern like this, but there is at least one principle that this method violates:
The Single-Responsibility-Principle.

And it really is a problem of the method and not of the parameter object.