Here __class__
should not be confused with self.__class__
which I am already able to access with the inspect
module:
import inspect
class A:
def __init__(self):
print(__class__.__name__) # I want to move this statement inside f
f()
class B(A):
pass
def f():
prev_frame = inspect.currentframe().f_back
self = prev_frame.f_locals["self"]
print(self.__class__.__name__)
B() # prints A B
The implicit __class__
reference is created at compile-time only if you actually reference it within the method (or use super
). For example this code:
class Foo:
def bar(self):
print('bar', locals())
def baz(self):
print('baz', locals())
if False:
__class__
if __name__ == '__main__':
foo = Foo()
foo.bar()
foo.baz()
Produces this output:
bar {'self': <__main__.Foo object at 0x10f45f978>}
baz {'self': <__main__.Foo object at 0x10f45f978>, '__class__': <class '__main__.Foo'>}
To find the calling function's class (in most cases) you could chain together a few CPython-specific inspect
incantations:
I wouldn't recommend it.