What is the interpretation of <>P -> (!P U R)? This seems to be contradiction since in future P is expected and checking the absence of P until R. Model checking tool passes this via BDD as well as BMC techniques.
I don't see any contradiction.
The property is made true by any Buchi automaton s.t.
i.e.
In natural language, one would express that property as follows: "If, by any chance, sooner or later P becomes true, then it must be the case that the 'event' R fired first".
For instance, you can imagine P be "sending answer message" and R be "received input message" and the whole property be "no unsolicited answer message is ever sent".