I have a class A defined like bellow:
class A
{
public:
A() = default;
explicit A(uint32_t a, uint32_t b)
{
std::cout << "construct" << std::endl;
}
A(const A& obj)
{
std::cout << "copy" << std::endl;
*this = obj;
}
A(const A&& obj)
{
std::cout << "move" << std::endl;
*this = obj;
}
A& operator=(const A& obj)
{
std::cout << "copy operator" << std::endl;
return *this;
}
A& operator=(const A&& obj)
{
std::cout << "move operator" << std::endl;
}
};
I use the class like this:
std::vector<std::pair<A, bool>> v;
v.emplace_back(A(0, 1), true);
The emplace_back has the following output:
construct
move
copy operator
My question is, is there any way to construct A of the pair in-place without calling the move and copy operator?
Yes, std::pair
has this constructor:
cppreference/utility/pair/pair
template< class... Args1, class... Args2 > pair( std::piecewise_construct_t, std::tuple<Args1...> first_args, std::tuple<Args2...> second_args );
Forwards the elements of
first_args
to the constructor offirs
t and forwards the elements ofsecond_args
to the constructor ofsecond
. This is the only non-default constructor that can be used to create a pair of non-copyable non-movable types.
You can therefore invoke:
std::vector<std::pair<A, bool>> v;
v.emplace_back(std::piecewise_construct,
std::make_tuple(0, 1),
std::make_tuple(true));