https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/gremlin-users/UZMD1qp5mfg discusses a group by example using the script:
gremlin> g.V.outE.groupBy{it.inV.next().name}{it.weight}{it.sum().doubleValue()}.cap.orderMap(T.decr)
based on the modern example graph:
I'd like to try this out using Java but:
First I only got as far as:
// g.V.outE.groupBy{it.inV.next().name}{it.weight}{it.sum().doubleValue()}.cap.orderMap(T.decr)
GraphTraversalSource g = TinkerFactory.createModern().traversal();
Map<Object, Object> map = g.V().outE().group().by().next();
if (debug) {
System.out.println(map.values().size());
for (Entry<Object, Object> entry : map.entrySet()) {
System.out
.println(String.format("%s=%s", entry.getKey(), entry.getValue()));
}
}
giving the debug output:
6
e[7][1-knows->2]=[e[7][1-knows->2]]
e[8][1-knows->4]=[e[8][1-knows->4]]
e[9][1-created->3]=[e[9][1-created->3]]
e[10][4-created->5]=[e[10][4-created->5]]
e[11][4-created->3]=[e[11][4-created->3]]
e[12][6-created->3]=[e[12][6-created->3]]
Then I experimented a bit like this:
import static org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.process.traversal.dsl.graph.__.*;
/**
* show the given map entries
*
* @param map
*/
public void showMap(String title, Map<Object, Object> map) {
System.out.println(title + ":" + map.values().size());
for (Entry<Object, Object> entry : map.entrySet()) {
System.out
.println(String.format("\t%s=%s", entry.getKey(), entry.getValue()));
}
}
public void showObject(String title, Object object) {
System.out.println(title+":"+object.toString());
}
@Test
/**
* https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/gremlin-users/UZMD1qp5mfg
* https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55771036/it-keyword-in-gremlin-java
*/
public void testGroupBy() {
// gremlin:
// g.V.outE.groupBy{it.inV.next().name}{it.weight}{it.sum().doubleValue()}.cap.orderMap(T.decr)
GraphTraversalSource g = TinkerFactory.createModern().traversal();
debug=true;
if (debug) {
g.V().outE().group().by().forEachRemaining(m -> showMap("by()", m));
g.V().outE().group().by(inV().id())
.forEachRemaining(m -> showMap("by(inV().id())", m));
g.V().outE().group("edges").by(inV().id()).cap("edges")
.forEachRemaining(o -> showObject("cap", o));
}
with the result:
by():6
e[7][1-knows->2]=[e[7][1-knows->2]]
e[8][1-knows->4]=[e[8][1-knows->4]]
e[9][1-created->3]=[e[9][1-created->3]]
e[10][4-created->5]=[e[10][4-created->5]]
e[11][4-created->3]=[e[11][4-created->3]]
e[12][6-created->3]=[e[12][6-created->3]]
by(inV().id()):4
2=[e[7][1-knows->2]]
3=[e[9][1-created->3], e[11][4-created->3], e[12][6-created->3]]
4=[e[8][1-knows->4]]
5=[e[10][4-created->5]]
cap:{2=[e[7][1-knows->2]], 3=[e[9][1-created->3], e[11][4-created->3], e[12][6-created->3]], 4=[e[8][1-knows->4]], 5=[e[10][4-created->5]]}
So it looks like the "it" can be simply left out and for the cap step the "group" has to be named. The other parts of the gremlin-groovy to Java translation I still do not understand.
How is the above script fully translated to Java?
In TinkerPop 3 it's as simple as:
g.V().outE().
group().
by(inV().values("name")).
by(values("weight").sum()).
order(local).
by(values, desc)
or in full java syntax:
import org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.structure.Column;
import org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.process.traversal.Order;
import org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.process.traversal.Scope;
import org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.process.traversal.dsl.graph.GraphTraversalSource;
import static org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.process.traversal.dsl.graph.__.*;
import org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.process.traversal.dsl.graph.__;
g.V().outE().
group().
by(inV().values("name")).
by(values("weight").sum()).
order(Scope.local).
by(Column.values, Order.desc)
with the result:
sum:{ripple=1.0, josh=1.0, lop=1.0, vadas=0.5}
UPDATE
To answer the question in your comment about using both vertices, it would be something like this:
g.E().
group().
by(bothV().values("name").fold()).
by(values("weight").sum()).
order(Scope.local).
by(Column.values, Order.desc)