I need to sample a matrix from a Wishart distribution with degrees of freedom smaller than the dimensionality of the scale matrix. I'm struggling to find an R function that allows it.
For a Wishart distribution, the degrees of freedom (call them df or v) must be greater than the dimensionality of the scale matrix (say p) minus 1 (i.e. df > p - 1) (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wishart_distribution or any manual on the Wishart distribution). However, when I try to sample from a wishart distribution with p-1 < df < p, say W(df = 1.1, I_p), where I_p is a pxp identity matrix, I get errors stating inconsistency of the degrees of freedom.
Say that p = 2, I want to sample from different Wishart distributions with df between 1 and 2 (excluded) but
stats::rWishart(n = 1, df = 1.1, Sigma = diag(2)) # does not work
MCMCpack::rwish(v = 1.1, S = diag(2)) # does not work
do not work.
I thought the problem might have been the non-integer degrees of freedom, but
stats::rWishart(n = 1, df = 2.1, Sigma = diag(2))
MCMCpack::rwish(v = 2.1, S = diag(2))
work without any problem.
I did find
rWishart::rWishart(1, df = 1.1, Sigma = diag(2)) # works
which works, but then it doesn't if 1.5 =< df < 2
rWishart::rWishart(1, df = 1.5, Sigma = diag(2)) # does not works
I would like to find way in R to sample from a Wishart distribution which has any degrees of freedom bigger than p-1 but smaller than p (p-1 < df < p). And it doesn't strictly matter to me whether the sampled matrix is singular or not.
As far as I know, matrixsampling
is the only package offering this possibility (I am its author).
library(matrixsampling)
rwishart(3, nu = 1.1, Sigma = diag(2))
# , , 1
#
# [,1] [,2]
# [1,] 0.7679333 -1.051319
# [2,] -1.0513191 1.439281
#
# , , 2
#
# [,1] [,2]
# [1,] 1.8536154 -0.9059983
# [2,] -0.9059983 0.4449708
#
# , , 3
#
# [,1] [,2]
# [1,] 0.9309460 0.6026472
# [2,] 0.6026472 0.3901232
If you really want to sample with the identity matrix as the scale matrix Sigma
, you can do:
matrixsampling:::rwishart_I(3, nu = 1.1, p = 2)
(to be honnest, I don't remember what I've done, but this should be more efficient).