Search code examples
rustmsgpack

What is the Rust equivalent of a JavaScript object when encoding with msgpack?


I'm trying to port a JavaScript library which uses msgpack for encoding JavaScript objects to Rust. I found a Rust library for msgpack encoding/decoding, but I don't get what is the equivalent input format in Rust.

This JavaScript code for encoding the object {"a": 5, "b": 6} gives the output 82 a1 61 03 a1 62 05:

const msgpack = require("msgpack-lite");
msgpack.encode(obj);

I tried representing the object as a Rust struct and encoding it using rmp-serde library

use rmp_serde::{Deserializer, Serializer};
use serde::{Deserialize, Serialize};

#[derive(Debug, Serialize, Deserialize)]
pub struct Test {
    a: u32,
    b: u32,
}

fn main() {
    let mut buf = Vec::new();
    let val = Test { a: 3, b: 5 };
    val.serialize(&mut Serializer::new(&mut buf)).unwrap();
    println!("{:?}", buf);
}

I get the output [146, 3, 5]. How do I represent JSON input in Rust?


Solution

  • What is the Rust equivalent of a JavaScript object

    That is a HashMap:

    use rmp_serde::{Deserializer, Serializer, encode::StructMapWriter};
    use serde::{Deserialize, Serialize};
    
    use std::collections::HashMap;
    
    #[derive(Debug, Serialize, Deserialize)]
    pub struct Test {
        a: u32,
        b: u32,
    }
    
    fn main() {
        let mut buf = Vec::new();
        let mut val = HashMap::new();
        val.insert("a", 3);
        val.insert("b", 5);
        val.serialize(&mut Serializer::new(&mut buf)).unwrap();
        println!("{:x?}", buf);
    
        let test: Test = Deserialize::deserialize(&mut Deserializer::new(&buf[..])).unwrap();
    
        println!("{:?}", test);
    
        buf.clear();
        test.serialize(&mut Serializer::with(&mut buf, StructMapWriter))
            .unwrap();
    
        println!("{:x?}", buf);
    }
    

    This gives the expected output:

    [82, a1, 61, 3, a1, 62, 5]
    Test { a: 3, b: 5 }
    [82, a1, 61, 3, a1, 62, 5]
    

    As you can see, you can deserialize into something other than a HashMap but serialization will not produce the same thing because you "lost" the information that it was a HashMap. The default of rmp is to use compact serialization ("This is the default constructor, which returns a serializer that will serialize structs using compact tuple representation, without field names."), but you can tell to rmp to serialize it differently if you need to with StructMapWriter.