So, disclaimer, I've only been using Ada for a few weeks now... I expect to have a noob mistake causing this.
So the (anonymized) code I have...
with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO;
with Ada.Containers.Synchronized_Queue_Interfaces;
with Ada.Containers.Bounded_Synchronized_Queues;
procedure Hello is
type ID_Type is ( Invalid_Id,
Config_Id);
for ID_Type use ( Invalid_Id => 16#00#,
Config_Id => 16#11# );
for ID_Type'Size use 8;
type Config_Type is
record
data : Integer;
end record;
type Data_Type (i : ID_Type := Invalid_Id) is
record
Id : ID_Type := i;
case i is
when Invalid_Id => null;
when Config_Id => config : Config_Type;
when others => null;
end case;
end record with Unchecked_Union, Convention => C;
package Queue_Interface is
new Ada.Containers.Synchronized_Queue_Interfaces(Data_Type);
package Data_Queue is
new Ada.Containers.Bounded_Synchronized_Queues
( Queue_Interfaces => Queue_Interface,
Default_Capacity => 1);
Queue_Array : array(1..1) of Data_Queue.Queue;
begin
Put_Line("Queue_Array(1)'Size = " & Integer'Image(Queue_Array(1)'Size));
end Hello;
On the online compiler (GNAT 7.1.1) this triggers: raised STORAGE_ERROR : s-intman.adb:136 explicit raise
Intended use is to interface with C-level drivers pulling data from serial port. (Hence the unchecked_union and other representation clauses)
Have tried wrapping with an Indefinite_Holder assuming the indefinite issue was from the Unconstrained type... and was getting the same error. Thought that I wouldn't need it because while it's an unconstrained variant it is definite in size. Same thing either way though.
Also worth noting that: test1 : array (ID_Type) Data_Type; -- works test2 : Data_Queue.Queue; -- works test3 : array (1 .. 2) Data_Queue.Queue; -- Storage_Error
What am I doing wrong?
The definition of the Bounded_Synchronized_Queue is
protected type Queue
(Capacity : Count_Type := Default_Capacity;
Ceiling : System.Any_Priority := Default_Ceiling)
with Priority => Ceiling is
new Queue_Interfaces.Queue
It looks like GNAT is trying to allocate size for all potential permutations of array sizes, leading to an extremely large sized type. Since this is a limited type, I'm not sure if it still has to do that or not (so may be a bug).
You can fix it by changing the declaration's discriminant to have a specific constraint:
-- create an array of queues
Queue_Array : array(ID_Type) of ID_Holder_Queue.Queue
(Capacity => 16,
Ceiling => System.Priority'Last);
and withing System;
That should remove your storage error. This might be related if you are using the GNAT compiler.