Is there any core difference between Liskov Substitution Principle (LSP) and Interface Segregation Principle (ISP)? Ultimately, both are vouching for designing the interface with common functionalities and introduce a new interface when you have special purpose of functionalities.
LSP: The subtype must honor the contracts it promises.
ISP: The caller shouldn't depend on more of the base type's interface than it needs.
Where they fit: If you apply the ISP, you use only a slice of the receiver's full interface. But according to LSP, the receiver must still honor that slice.
If you fail to apply ISP, there can be a temptation to violate LSP. Because "this method doesn't matter, it won't actually be called."