I am populating a string vector from any of char[] char* std::string by emplacing them in the std::vector
This code works but is a bit clunky looking and takes three templates to cover variadics and initializer lists.
Is there a more canonical idiom for this kind of thing?
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <cstring>
#include <vector>
#include <stdexcept>
// safe function for putting char* strings into a std::vector<std::string>
template <typename T, typename C>
std::vector<T> & safe_emplace( std::vector<T>& vec, C& c)
{
if ( !c ) return vec;
vec.emplace_back(c);
return vec;
}
// variadic version
template <typename T, typename C, typename... Args>
std::vector<T> & safe_emplace( std::vector<T>& vec, C& c, Args... args)
{
safe_emplace(vec, c);
return safe_emplace( vec, args...);
}
// initializer list version
template <typename T>
std::vector<T> & safe_emplace( std::vector<T>& vec, const std::initializer_list<std::string> il)
{
for (auto& s: il)
vec.emplace_back(s);
return vec;
}
int main( int argc, char* argv[])
{
std::vector<std::string> svec;
char one[] = "string one";
char two[] = "string two";
char three[] = "string three";
char* d = new char[10];
char* n = NULL;
std::strncpy(d, "0123456789\0", 10);
safe_emplace(svec, one); // char[]
safe_emplace(svec, two, three); // variadic
safe_emplace(svec, d); // char*
safe_emplace(svec, n); // char* NULL
safe_emplace(svec, "five", "four", "three", "two", "one", nullptr);
safe_emplace(svec, {"A", "B", "C", "D", "E"} );
for (auto s : svec)
std::cout << s << "\n";
delete[] d; // clean up d (new)
return 0;
}
I specifically wanted to handle the case of a NULL char* which I decided to skip it instead of create an empty string.
I had a try/catch for nullptr, but found it was not necessary with the templates.
This code works but is a bit clunky looking and takes three templates to cover variadics and initializer lists.
Is there a more canonical idiom for this kind of thing?
Not really, since you have to handle the variadic template and initializer_list
separately.
I specifically wanted to handle the case of a NULL char* which I decided to skip it instead of create an empty string.
Then you should provide an overload of safe_emplace()
to handle char*
data separately from other types.
Try something more like this instead:
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <vector>
#include <cstring>
// rename the actual emplacement functions to avoid unwanted
// recursive loops in the variadic template iteration...
template <typename Container>
Container& do_safe_emplace(Container &c, const char *value)
{
if (value) c.emplace_back(value);
return c;
}
template <typename Container>
Container& do_safe_emplace(Container &c, const typename Container::value_type &value)
{
c.emplace_back(value);
return c;
}
// this overload is needed to handle when 'args...' becomes blank
// at the end of the variadic template loop iteration...
template <typename Container>
Container& safe_emplace(Container &c)
{
return c;
}
template <typename Container, typename T, typename... Args>
Container& safe_emplace(Container &c, const T &value, Args... args)
{
do_safe_emplace(c, value);
return safe_emplace(c, args...);
}
template <typename Container, typename T>
Container& safe_emplace(Container &c, const std::initializer_list<T> il)
{
for (auto& value: il)
do_safe_emplace(c, value);
return c;
}
int main()
{
std::vector<std::string> svec;
char one[] = "string one";
char two[] = "string two";
char three[] = "string three";
std::string four = "string four";
char* d = new char[11]; // <- need room for null terminator
char* n = NULL;
std::strncpy(d, "0123456789", 11);
safe_emplace(svec, one); // char[]
safe_emplace(svec, two, three, four); // variadic
safe_emplace(svec, d); // char*
safe_emplace(svec, n); // char* NULL
safe_emplace(svec, "five", "four", std::string("three"), "two", "one", nullptr);
safe_emplace(svec, {"A", "B", "C", "D", "E"} );
for (auto &s : svec)
std::cout << s << "\n";
delete[] d; // clean up d (new)
return 0;
}