I have a small text file in markdown :
---
title: postWithReference
author: auf
date: 2010-07-29
keywords: homepage
abstract: |
What are the objects of
ontologists .
bibliography: "/home/frank/Workspace8/SSG/site/resources/BibTexLatex.bib"
csl: "/home/frank/Workspace8/SSG/site/resources/chicago-fullnote-bibliography-bb.csl"
---
An example post. With a reference to [@Frank2010a] and more[@navratil08].
## References
and process it in Haskell with processCites'
which has a single argument, namely the Pandoc
data resulting from readMarkdown
. The bibliography and the csl style should be taken from the input file.
The process does not produce errors, but the result of processCites
is the same text as the input; references are not treated at all. For the same input the references are resolved with the standalone pandoc (this excludes errors in the bibliography and the csl style)
pandoc -f markdown -t html --filter=pandoc-citeproc -o p1.html postWithReference.md
The issue is therefore in the API. The code I have is:
markdownToHTML4 :: Text -> PandocIO Value
markdownToHTML4 t = do
pandoc <- readMarkdown markdownOptions t
let meta2 = flattenMeta (getMeta pandoc)
-- test if biblio is present and apply
let bib = Just $ ( meta2) ^? key "bibliography" . _String
pandoc2 <- case bib of
Nothing -> return pandoc
_ -> do
res <- liftIO $ processCites' pandoc -- :: Pandoc -> IO Pandoc
when (res == pandoc) $
liftIO $ putStrLn "*** markdownToHTML3 result without references ***"
return res
htmltex <- writeHtml5String html5Options pandoc2
let withContent = ( meta2) & _Object . at "contentHtml" ?~ String ( htmltex)
return withContent
getMeta :: Pandoc -> Meta
getMeta (Pandoc m _) = m
What do I misunderstand? are there any reader options necessary for citeproc? The bibliography is a BibLatex file.
I found in hakyll code a comment, which I cannot understand in light of the code there - perhaps somebody knows what the intention is.
-- We need to know the citation keys, add then *before* actually parsing the
-- actual page. If we don't do this, pandoc won't even consider them
-- citations!
The original problem was very simple: I had not included the option Ext_citations
in the markdownOptions
. When it is included, the example works (thanks to help I received from the pandoc-citeproc
issue page). The referenced code is updated...