I have done explicit specializations before, I just can't figure out why this does not work:
StringUtils.hpp
#ifndef AYC_STRINGUTILS_HPP
#define AYC_STRINGUTILS_HPP
#include <string>
class StringUtils {
public:
template <typename T>
static std::string toString(const T& t);
};
#include "StringUtils.tpp"
#endif //AYC_STRINGUTILS_HPP
StringUtils.tpp
#include "StringUtils.hpp"
template<typename T>
std::string StringUtils::toString(const T& t) {
return std::to_string(t);
}
template<>
std::string StringUtils::toString<std::string>(const std::string& t) {
return t;
}
The errors I get are linker errors complaining about multiple definitions of the function toString
.
Many files in the project use #include "StringUtils.hpp"
.
How can I try to fix this error? Is something wrong in the class StringUtils
?
In addition to the solution provided in the answer by Brian, you can declare the specialization in the .hpp/.tpp file and define it in a .cpp file.
StringUtils.hpp file:
#ifndef AYC_STRINGUTILS_HPP
#define AYC_STRINGUTILS_HPP
#include <string>
class StringUtils {
public:
template <typename T>
static std::string toString(const T& t);
};
// Generic implementation.
template<typename T>
std::string StringUtils::toString(const T& t) {
return std::to_string(t);
}
// Declation of the specialization.
template<>
std::string StringUtils::toString<std::string>(const std::string& t);
#endif //AYC_STRINGUTILS_HPP
StringUtils.cpp file:
#include "StringUtils.hpp"
// Definition of the specialization.
template<>
std::string StringUtils::toString<std::string>(const std::string& t) {
return t;
}
Test program:
#include <iostream>
#include "StringUtils.hpp"
int main()
{
std::string a("test");
std::cout << StringUtils::toString(a) << std::endl;
std::cout << StringUtils::toString(10) << std::endl;
}
Output of the test program:
test
10