I am trying to represent a non-directional graph. I created three structs as shown below. I added operator == and operator < to the Edge struct hoping the set would use it to compare elements.
struct Node; /* Forward references to these two types */
struct Edge; /* that the compiler can recognize them */
/* Type: Node
* This type represents an individual node and consists of the data of the
* node and the set of edges from this node */
struct Node{
int nodeNum;
string data;
set<Edge*> edges;
};
/* Type: Edge
* This type represents an individual edge and consists of pointers to the
* endpoints */
struct Edge{
Node *end1;
Node *end2;
// This says that edge from node 1 to node 2 and edge from node 2 to node 1 are considered the same
bool operator==(const Edge &e) const{
return ( (this->end1->nodeNum == e.end1->nodeNum && this->end2->nodeNum == e.end2->nodeNum) ||
(this->end1->nodeNum == e.end2->nodeNum && this->end2->nodeNum == e.end1->nodeNum));
}
// This function is used by set to order elements of edges.
bool operator<(const Edge *e) const{
return (this->end1 < e->end1 && this->end2 < e->end2);
}
};
// This is a struct for graph
struct Graph{
set<Node*> Nodes;
set<Edge*> Edges;
map<int, Node*> nodeMap;
};
Question: If say, I have an edge from node 1 to 2 and an edge from 2 to 1, my struct declaration says they should be considered equivalent. Yet when I insert those two edges in a set, it inserts both of them as two separate elements (i.e. set does not understand that edge 1-2 and 2-1 are equal). What do I do so that the set took care of duplicates (i.e. only keeps one of these edges). See e.g. below:
int main(){
// Let's make 2 nodes, node 1 and node 2
Node* n1 = new Node;
Node* n2 = new Node;
n1->nodeNum=1;
n2->nodeNum=2;
// Let's make 2 edges 1-2 and 2-1
Edge* e1 = new Edge;
Edge* e2 = new Edge;
e1->end1=n1; e1->end2=n2;
e2->end1=n2; e2->end2=n1;
// Now let's make a graph and put the edges in its internal set
Graph g;
g.Edges.insert(e1);
g.Edges.insert(e2); // the set takes in both e1 and e2. If I print all elements in g.Edges, it will print both 1-2 and 2-1
// How do I tell the set to treat e1 and e2 as equal edges so it took care of duplicates?
return 0;
}
std::set<T*>
will create a set of memory locations, not a set of T values.
If you want to compare the pointed objects, you need to provide a custom comparator:
struct Ptr_compare {
template<typename T>
constexpr bool operator()( const T* lhs, const T* rhs ) const {
return *lhs < *rhs;
}
};
// This is a struct for graph
struct Graph {
set<Node*, Ptr_compare> Nodes;
set<Edge*, Ptr_compare> Edges;
map<int, Node*> nodeMap;
};
However:
Be aware that the code I wrote answers your question, but is still not correct for your use-case, it's only ok to use this for non-owning pointers, which is most definitely not your case.
This is not a problem with my solution per-se, but a fundamental issue in what you are trying to accomplish. Something needs to call delete
on the dedupped objects.