I just started testing Marten (2.9), and so far I am loving it. However, I am not sure I am following the DocumentStore.For
method. For example, in my "dbhandler" for Marten, I can write:
public MartenDbHandler()
{
store = DocumentStore.For(_ =>
{
_.AutoCreateSchemaObjects = AutoCreate.CreateOrUpdate;
_.Connection("host=localhost;database=marten;password=root;username=postgres");
_.Schema.For<Customer>().Index(x => x.PopulationRegistryNumber);
});
}
but naturally, I do not want to have all that schema code when I initialize the database and supply the connection string.
So I thought, maybe I can pass on the store
variable, and do the same, but then the For
thing doesn't exist:
... and I haven't really found a way to set the Schema in any other way.
What I really want to do is to have an Interface, that is dynamically loaded and executed (via Reflection) when I start my application, that handles those things, like an IMartenMetaData
that looks something like:
public interface IMartenMetaData
{
SetMetaData(DocumentStore store);
}
and then implement the schema things in that/those classes, but that doesn't work because I can't use the DocumentStore to set the meta.
I managed to do a much nice approach to keep it more dynamic and not all in the construction of DocumentStore.
Please see code below. The idea is straightforward:
Create the StoreOptions separately
Before creation of the DocumentStore, run method that via Reflection finds all classes of a certain Type that will add table meta data
Create the DocumentStore
public MartenDbHandler()
{
StoreOptions so = new StoreOptions();
so.Connection("host=localhost;database=marten;password=root;username=postgres");
so.AutoCreateSchemaObjects = AutoCreate.CreateOrUpdate;
SetTableMeta(so);
store = new DocumentStore(so);
}
private void SetTableMeta(StoreOptions storeOptions)
{
// We get the current assembly through the current class
var currentAssembly = Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly();
// we filter the defined classes according to the interfaces they implement
var stuff = currentAssembly.DefinedTypes.Where(type => type.IsSubclassOf(typeof(MartenTableMetaDataBase))).ToList();
foreach (Type type in stuff)
{
IMartenTableMetaData temp = (IMartenTableMetaData)Activator.CreateInstance(type);
temp.SetTableMetaData(storeOptions);
}
OnLogEvent?.Invoke(this, $"{stuff.Count} table meta data initialized");
}
The IMartenTableMetaData is a base class for the IMartenTableMetaData interface. In the example below, the base class isn't used, but I normally find it good to have a base class (I use a similar approach to another ORM, where I actually use the base class). But, the base class can of course be removed if you have no use for it.
internal abstract class MartenTableMetaDataBase : IMartenTableMetaData
{
public void SetTableMetaData(StoreOptions storeOptions)
{
SetSpecificTableMetaData(storeOptions);
}
protected abstract void SetSpecificTableMetaData(StoreOptions storeOptions);
}
and the interface:
public interface IMartenTableMetaData
{
void SetTableMetaData(StoreOptions storeOptions);
}
So, I can now create a class for each Type I want to add meta data too, like this:
internal class MartenTableMetaDataCustomer : MartenTableMetaDataBase
{
protected override void SetSpecificTableMetaData(StoreOptions storeOptions)
{
storeOptions.Schema.For<Customer>().Index(x => x.Muni);
}
}
or
internal class MartenTableMetaDataDriver : MartenTableMetaDataBase
{
protected override void SetSpecificTableMetaData(StoreOptions storeOptions)
{
storeOptions.Schema.For<Driver>().Index(x => x.Username);
}
}
etc.
This will keep the Marten DB handler clean and meta data separated into specific classes for readability, clarity and all that stuff =)