I saw many comparisons on Stackoverflow, DBA and Server Fault, but it's never actually clear when it comes to performance with specific situations, whether using COMPACT
or REDUNDANT
row format with InnoDB
Are there any cases in which some simple tables would have a definitive performance boost? For example in a simple relational table user_roles
that would map a users
table with a roles
table, using two integers
that will always make a row the same size on disk?
If that's not a good example, are there good examples that would make a clear difference?
Thanks!
COMPACT
format is slightly better with storing field lengths. REDUNDANT
stores length for every field even if it's a fixed size INT. COMPACT
however stores only lengths of variable length fields.
IMO that will contribute to performance difference so little that it doesn't make sense to bother with formats.