For c++20 it is proposed to add the following syntax for generic lambdas p0428r2.pdf
auto f = []<typename T>( T t ) {};
But the current implementation in gcc 8 did not accept the following instantiation:
f<std::string>("");
Is that a implementation bug in gcc or a missing language feature? I know we talk about a proposal and not a approved specification.
Complete example ( with comparison to template function syntax ):
template <typename T> void n( T t ) { std::cout << t << std::endl; }
auto f = []<typename T>( T t ) { std::cout << t << std::endl; };
int main()
{
f<std::string>("Hello"); // error!
n<std::string>("World");
}
complains with following error:
main.cpp:25:22: error: expected primary-expression before '>' token f("Hello");
The result of a lambda expression is not a function; it is a function object. That is, it is a class type that has an operator()
overload on it. So this:
auto f = []<typename T>( T t ) {};
Is equivalent to this:
struct unnamed
{
template<typename T>
void operator()(T t) {}
};
auto f = unnamed{};
If you want to explicitly provide template arguments to a lambda function, you have to call operator()
explicitly:
f.operator()</* template arguments ... */>(parameters);