I just started using Jena Apache, on their introduction they explain how to write out the created model. As input I'm using a Turtle syntax file containing some data about some OWL ontologies, and I'm using the @base directive to use relative URI's on the syntax:
@base <https://valbuena.com/ontology-test/> .
And then writing my data as:
<sensor/AD590/1> a sosa:Sensor ;
rdfs:label "AD590 #1 temperatue sensor"@en ;
sosa:observes <room/1#Temperature> ;
ssn:implements <MeasureRoomTempProcedure> .
Apache Jena is able to read that @base directive and expands the relative URI to its full version, but when I write it out Jena doesn't write the @base directive and the relative URI's. The output is shown as:
<https://valbuena.com/ontology-test/sensor/AD590/1> a sosa:Sensor ;
rdfs:label "AD590 #1 temperatue sensor"@en ;
sosa:observes <https://valbuena.com/ontology-test/room/1#Temperature> ;
ssn:implements <https://valbuena.com/ontology-test/MeasureRoomTempProcedure> .
My code is the following:
Model m = ModelFactory.createOntologyModel();
String base = "https://valbuena.com/ontology-test/";
InputStream in = FileManager.get().open("src/main/files/example.ttl");
if (in == null) {
System.out.println("file error");
return;
} else {
m.read(in, null, "TURTLE");
}
m.write(System.out, "TURTLE");
There are multiple read and write commands that take as parameter the base:
I'm not sure if this is a bug or it's just not possible.
It seems that the command used on the introduction tutorial of Jena RDF API is not updated and they show the reading method I showed before (FileManager) which now is replaced by RDFDataMgr. The FileManager way doesn't work with "base" directive well.
After experimenting I've found that the base directive works well with:
Model model = ModelFactory.createDefaultModel();
RDFDataMgr.read(model,"src/main/files/example.ttl");
model.write(System.out, "TURTLE", base);
or
Model model = ModelFactory.createDefaultModel();
model.read("src/main/files/example.ttl");
model.write(System.out, "TURTLE", base);
Although the model.write() command is said to be legacy on RDF output documentation (whereas model.read() is considered common on RDF input documentation, don't understand why), it is the only one I have found that allows the "base" parameter (required to put the @base directive on the output again), RDFDataMgr write methods don't include it.
Thanks to @AndyS for providing a simpler way to read the data, which led to fix the problem.