As DateTime
cannot be declared as volatile
, is this right?
private DateTime _time;
public DateTime Time
{
get
{
Thread.MemoryBarrier();
return _time;
}
set
{
_time = value;
Thread.MemoryBarrier();
}
}
That property could be accessed from different threads, so I want to ensure they get always the latest version, without use contention (lock
).
EDIT:
DateTime
property named CreationTime
, indicating when this item was created. It's initialized to DateTime.UtcNow
.DateTime.UtcNow
.if (DateTime.UtcNow + 1 hour) > item.CreationTime
, if true it deletes the item.I want to ensure that when the "deletion thread" comes into the collection, all the items have their latest "last access" DateTime
on it, so I can avoid create the item again just because a cache held the value for a couple of milliseconds. :D
Precisely.
But, you have another option. Store the time as an Int64 tick count, and use InterlockedExchange
to set. Threads can then construct their own DateTime
using The Int64 constructor, giving you no contention and no locks.
EDIT:
Given that you've provided more information, it's easier now to provide an example.
public class Cache
{
class CacheEntry
{
private Int64 m_Touched;
public CacheEntry()
{
Touch();
}
public void Touch()
{
System.Threading.Interlocked.Exchange(ref m_Touched, DateTime.Now.Ticks);
}
public DateTime Touched
{
get
{
return new DateTime(Interlocked.Read(ref m_Touched));
}
}
} // eo class CacheEntry
} // eo class Cache